Got it. Thank you for sharing that, Reynold.

So, you mean they will use `Apache Spark 3.0.0` on the old clusters with
Hive 0.x, right?

If that happens actually, no problem to keep them.

Bests,
Dongjoon.


On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:49 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Based on my experience in development of Spark SQL, the maintenance cost
> is very small for supporting different versions of Hive metastore. Feel
> free to ping me if we hit any issue about it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Xiao
>
> Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> 于2019年1月22日周二 下午11:18写道:
>
>> Actually a non trivial fraction of users / customers I interact with
>> still use very old Hive metastores. Because it’s very difficult to upgrade
>> Hive metastore wholesale (it’d require all the production jobs that access
>> the same metastore be upgraded at once). This is even harder than JVM
>> upgrade which can be done on a per job basis, or OS upgrade that can be
>> done on a per machine basis.
>>
>> Is there high maintenance cost with keeping these? My understanding is
>> that Michael did a good job initially with classloader isolation and
>> modular design that they are very easy to maintain.
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2019, at 11:13 PM, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yea, I was thinking about that too. They are too old to keep. +1 for
>> removing them out.
>>
>> 2019년 1월 23일 (수) 오전 11:30, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>
>>> Hi, All.
>>>
>>> Currently, Apache Spark supports Hive Metastore(HMS) 0.12 ~ 2.3.
>>> Among them, HMS 0.x releases look very old since we are in 2019.
>>> If these are not used in the production any more, can we drop HMS 0.x
>>> supports in 3.0.0?
>>>
>>> hive-0.12.0                     2013-10-10
>>> hive-0.13.0                     2014-04-15
>>> hive-0.13.1                     2014-11-16
>>> hive-0.14.0                     2014-11-16
>>> ( https://archive.apache.org/dist/hive/ )
>>>
>>> In addition, if there is someone who is still using these HMS versions
>>> and has a plan to install and use Spark 3.0.0 with these HMS versions,
>>> could you reply this email thread? If there is a reason, that would be very
>>> helpful for me.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dongjoon.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to