Hi, Xingbo.

Could you sent a vote result email to finalize this vote, please?

Bests,
Dongjoon.

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:55 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1, too.
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 3:36 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 15:36 Wenchen Fan, <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The PR builder uses Hadoop 2.7 profile, which makes me think that 2.7 is
>>> more stable and we should make releases using 2.7 by default.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:16 AM Xiao Li <lix...@databricks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Spark 3.0 will still use the Hadoop 2.7 profile by default, I think.
>>>> Hadoop 2.7 profile is much more stable than Hadoop 3.2 profile.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:54 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This isn't a big thing, but I see that the pyspark build includes
>>>>> Hadoop 2.7 rather than 3.2. Maybe later we change the build to put in
>>>>> 3.2 by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, the tests all seems to pass with JDK 8 / 11 with all
>>>>> profiles enabled, so I'm +1 on it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:00 AM Xingbo Jiang <jiangxb1...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>>> version 3.0.0-preview.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The vote is open until November 3 PST and passes if a majority +1
>>>>> PMC votes are cast, with
>>>>> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.0.0-preview
>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>>>>> http://spark.apache.org/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The tag to be voted on is v3.0.0-preview-rc2 (commit
>>>>> 007c873ae34f58651481ccba30e8e2ba38a692c4):
>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.0.0-preview-rc2
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>>>>> at:
>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-preview-rc2-bin/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1336/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-preview-rc2-docs/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The list of bug fixes going into 3.0.0 can be found at the following
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12339177
>>>>> >
>>>>> > FAQ
>>>>> >
>>>>> > =========================
>>>>> > How can I help test this release?
>>>>> > =========================
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>>>> > an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate,
>>>>> then
>>>>> > reporting any regressions.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>>>> > the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the
>>>>> Java/Scala
>>>>> > you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and
>>>>> test
>>>>> > with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>>>> > you don't end up building with an out of date RC going forward).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ===========================================
>>>>> > What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.0.0?
>>>>> > ===========================================
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.0.0 can be found at:
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for
>>>>> "Target Version/s" = 3.0.0
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>>>> > fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>>>> > be worked on immediately.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ==================
>>>>> > But my bug isn't fixed?
>>>>> > ==================
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>> > release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>>>> > release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>>>> > that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>>>> > help target the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> [image: Databricks Summit - Watch the talks]
>>>> <https://databricks.com/sparkaisummit/north-america>
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> ---
> Takeshi Yamamuro
>

Reply via email to