+1. Just as a note, - SPARK-31918 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31918> is fixed now, and there's no blocker. - When we build SparkR, we should use the latest R version at least 4.0.0+.
2020년 6월 24일 (수) 오전 11:20, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > +1 > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 on a 3.0.1 soon. >> >> Probably it would be nice if some Scala experts can take a look at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32051 and include the fix >> into 3.0.1 if possible. >> Looks like APIs designed to work with Scala 2.11 & Java bring >> ambiguity in Scala 2.12 & Java. >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote: >>> >>> >>> +1 on a patch release soon >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 on doing a new patch release soon. I saw some of these issues when >>>> preparing the 3.0 release, and some of them are very serious. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:06 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman < >>>> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 Thanks Yuanjian -- I think it'll be great to have a 3.0.1 release >>>>> soon. >>>>> >>>>> Shivaram >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:43 AM Takeshi Yamamuro < >>>>> linguin....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the heads-up, Yuanjian! >>>>> >>>>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. >>>>> >>>>> wow, the updates are so quick. Anyway, +1 for the release. >>>>> >>>>> Bests, >>>>> Takeshi >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:59 PM Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi dev-list, >>>>> >>>>> I’m writing this to raise the discussion about Spark 3.0.1 feasibility >>>>> since 4 blocker issues were found after Spark 3.0.0: >>>>> >>>>> [SPARK-31990] The state store compatibility broken will cause a >>>>> correctness issue when Streaming query with `dropDuplicate` uses the >>>>> checkpoint written by the old Spark version. >>>>> >>>>> [SPARK-32038] The regression bug in handling NaN values in >>>>> COUNT(DISTINCT) >>>>> >>>>> [SPARK-31918][WIP] CRAN requires to make it working with the latest R >>>>> 4.0. It makes the 3.0 release unavailable on CRAN, and only supports R >>>>> [3.5, 4.0) >>>>> >>>>> [SPARK-31967] Downgrade vis.js to fix Jobs UI loading time regression >>>>> >>>>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. I >>>>> think it would be great if we have Spark 3.0.1 to deliver the critical >>>>> fixes. >>>>> >>>>> Any comments are appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Yuanjian >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> --- >>>>> Takeshi Yamamuro >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>> >>>
