+1

发件人: Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com>
日期: 2021年1月19日 星期二 下午3:04
收件人: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com>
抄送: Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com>, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>, dev 
<dev@spark.apache.org>
主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.1.1 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding)


On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 2:05 PM Jungtaek Lim 
<kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com<mailto:kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)

* verified signature and sha for all files (there's a glitch which I'll 
describe in below)
* built source (DISCLAIMER: didn't run tests) and made custom distribution, and 
built a docker image based on the distribution
  - used profiles: kubernetes, hadoop-3.2, hadoop-cloud
* ran some SS PySpark queries (Rate to Kafka, Kafka to Kafka) with Spark on k8s 
(used MinIO - s3 compatible - as checkpoint location)
  - for Kafka reader, tested both approaches: newer (offset via admin client) 
and older (offset via consumer)
* ran simple batch query with magic committer against MinIO storage & dynamic 
volume provisioning (with NFS)
* verified DataStreamReader.table & DataStreamWriter.toTable works in PySpark 
(which also verifies on Scala API as well)
* ran test stateful SS queries and checked the new additions of SS UI (state 
store & watermark information)

A glitch from verifying sha; the file format of sha512 is different between 
source targz and others. My tool succeeded with others and failed with source 
targz, though I confirmed sha itself is the same. Not a blocker but would be 
ideal if we can make it be consistent.

Thanks for driving the release process!

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM Yuming Wang 
<wgy...@gmail.com<mailto:wgy...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 7:54 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
<gurwls...@gmail.com<mailto:gurwls...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I forgot to say :). I'll start with my +1.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, 21:06 Hyukjin Kwon, 
<gurwls...@gmail.com<mailto:gurwls...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 3.1.1.

The vote is open until January 22nd 4PM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC 
votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.1.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

To learn more about Apache Spark, please see 
http://spark.apache.org/<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=eJcUboQ1HRRomPZKEwRzpl69wA8DbI%2fNIiRNsQ%3d%3d>

The tag to be voted on is v3.1.1-rc1 (commit 
53fe365edb948d0e05a5ccb62f349cd9fcb4bb5d):
https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.1.1-rc1<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=zbqz3MYVbEd1sSCjZ7dX%2fJD3avlvWUFYXV4XHiBGkriN7VNdz23Md8oHpZhgZNHwTl%2b6pw%3d%3d>

The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.1.1-rc1-bin/<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=aBUdO5bKlQP35zEYFIwQs7sgFgN%2bTaWXQBUm6jT9tZTdMsKBOoSjep4yC04DBd060%2bkzEn8GSVRVmKCdNzWkNA%3d%3d>

Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=E6fHbSXEWw02TTJBpc3bfA9mi7ea0YiWcNHkm%2fDJxwlaWinGnMdaoO1PahHhgj00vKwcbElpuHA%3d>

The staging repository for this release can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1364<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=VRy9actRQw148oVco9CQh18idb79jbu25AC5BncG93syW0z8%2fFyrn5GAVgSG4PWYkKnxeNs0GJ3sGOlFC5uqGY74FJQLjdigMqU%2fPg%3d%3d>

The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.1.1-rc1-docs/<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=BuqQ5RY8M9vELgwt8zAa05tgP3VLDkM5wCGFLETwfH46h6yW0kFTMFljBWN0FCBxW9L25rwk2mugmwQie48oBugdDnc%3d>

The list of bug fixes going into 3.1.1 can be found at the following URL:
https://s.apache.org/41kf2<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=Gtq8o%2b5UFC60hSOfJ6de%2bsVEWcpGcb7IwyVvW%2fuTK%2b8%3d>

This release is using the release script of the tag v3.1.1-rc1.

FAQ

===================
What happened to 3.1.0?
===================

There was a technical issue during Apache Spark 3.1.0 preparation, and it was 
discussed and decided to skip 3.1.0.
Please see 
https://spark.apache.org/news/next-official-release-spark-3.1.1.html<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=QADCNwn2yfjg8NxQF0Z8XlCKD1pWeI%2flwL0aMyvhC5KneSAMGvjx1iPMGubKOn50YiVHcBkWh1%2br%2frGpo5dzzA8QFvRqTagn>
 for more details.
=========================
How can I help test this release?
=========================

If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
reporting any regressions.

If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
the current RC via "pip install 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.1.1-rc1-bin/pyspark-3.1.1.tar.gz<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=joMLIhLN%2fq%2bgh99cyr7a5mYBSslorlP3n7SbsxeOrBa4d8OqZg7koIbumZ4L5seSeHBV040KquPwDlv9VGEgq28%2fLQt7ywvG1IJqBcDHgXhI2laB>"
and see if anything important breaks.
In the Java/Scala, you can add the staging repository to your projects 
resolvers and test
with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
you don't end up building with an out of date RC going forward).

===========================================
What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.1.1?
===========================================

The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.1.1 can be found at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK<https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=4UUpJqq41y71Gnuj0qTUYo6hTjqzT7oytN6x%2fvgC5XUtQUC8MfJ77tj7K70O%2f1QMmNoa1A%3d%3d>
 and search for "Target Version/s" = 3.1.1

Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
appropriate release.

==================
But my bug isn't fixed?
==================

In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
help target the issue.

Reply via email to