+1 adding it any way.

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021, 21:54 Holden Karau, <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote:

> +1 for an external module.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:51 AM Cheng Su <chen...@fb.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 for (2) adding to external module.
>>
>> I think this feature is useful and popular in practice, and option 2 is
>> not conflict with previous concern for dependency.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cheng Su
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Monday, February 8, 2021 at 10:39 AM
>> *To: *Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
>> *Cc: *Liang-Chi Hsieh <vii...@gmail.com>, dev <dev@spark.apache.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [DISCUSS] Add RocksDB StateStore
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you, Liang-chi and all.
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 for (2) external module design because it can deliver the new feature
>> in a safe way.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bests,
>>
>> Dongjoon
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:00 AM Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm "okay to add RocksDB StateStore as external module". See no reason
>> not to.
>>
>>
>> Pozdrawiam,
>>
>> Jacek Laskowski
>>
>> ----
>>
>> https://about.me/JacekLaskowski
>>
>> "The Internals Of" Online Books <https://books.japila.pl/>
>>
>> Follow me on https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski
>>
>>
>> <https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:32 AM Liang-Chi Hsieh <vii...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> In Spark structured streaming, we need state store for state management
>> for
>> stateful operators such streaming aggregates, joins, etc. We have one and
>> only one state store implementation now. It is in-memory hashmap which was
>> backed up in HDFS complaint file system at the end of every micro-batch.
>>
>> As it basically uses in-memory map to store states, memory consumption is
>> a
>> serious issue and state store size is limited by the size of the executor
>> memory. Moreover, state store using more memory means it may impact the
>> performance of task execution that requires memory too.
>>
>> Internally we see more streaming applications that requires large state in
>> stateful operations. For such requirements, we need a StateStore not rely
>> on
>> memory to store states.
>>
>> This seems to be also true externally as several other major streaming
>> frameworks already use RocksDB for state management. RocksDB is an
>> embedded
>> DB and streaming engines can use it to store state instead of memory
>> storage.
>>
>> So seems to me, it is proven to be good choice for large state usage. But
>> Spark SS still lacks of a built-in state store for the requirement.
>>
>> Previously there was one attempt SPARK-28120 to add RocksDB StateStore
>> into
>> Spark SS. IIUC, it was pushed back due to two concerns: extra code
>> maintenance cost and it introduces RocksDB dependency.
>>
>> For the first concern, as more users require to use the feature, it should
>> be highly used code in SS and more developers will look at it. For second
>> one, we propose (SPARK-34198) to add it as an external module to relieve
>> the
>> dependency concern.
>>
>> Because it was pushed back previously, I'm going to raise this discussion
>> to
>> know what people think about it now, in advance of submitting any code.
>>
>> I think there might be some possible opinions:
>>
>> 1. okay to add RocksDB StateStore into sql core module
>> 2. not okay for 1, but okay to add RocksDB StateStore as external module
>> 3. either 1 or 2 is okay
>> 4. not okay to add RocksDB StateStore, no matter into sql core or as
>> external module
>>
>> Please let us know if you have some thoughts.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Liang-Chi Hsieh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
>

Reply via email to