+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 7:59 AM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 1:01 AM Maxim Gekk <maxim.g...@databricks.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 10:44 AM Mich Talebzadeh < >> mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> view my Linkedin profile >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for >>> any loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may >>> arise from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly >>> disclaimed. The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages >>> arising from such loss, damage or destruction. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 08:42, Peter Toth <peter.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:16 AM Cheng Su <chen...@fb.com.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Cheng Su >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From: *Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> >>>>> *Date: *Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 11:57 PM >>>>> *To: *Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com> >>>>> *Cc: *Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>, 郑瑞峰 < >>>>> ruife...@foxmail.com>, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>, Gengliang Wang < >>>>> ltn...@gmail.com>, dev <dev@spark.apache.org> >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.2.0 (RC7) >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> [image: Image removed by sender.] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:54 PM, Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 1:02 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for Apache Spark 3.2.0 RC7. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It looks good to me. I tested with EKS 1.21 additionally. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Dongjoon. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:46 PM 郑瑞峰 <ruife...@foxmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *发件人**:* "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com>; >>>>> >>>>> *发送时间**:* 2021年10月7日(星期四) 晚上10:23 >>>>> >>>>> *收件人**:* "Gengliang Wang"<ltn...@gmail.com>; >>>>> >>>>> *抄送**:* "dev"<dev@spark.apache.org>; >>>>> >>>>> *主题**:* Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.2.0 (RC7) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 again. Looks good in Scala 2.12, 2.13, and in Java 11. >>>>> >>>>> I note that the mem requirements for Java 11 tests seem to need to be >>>>> increased but we're handling that separately. It doesn't really affect >>>>> users. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:49 AM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as >>>>> Apache Spark version 3.2.0. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time October 11 and passes if >>>>> a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.2.0 >>>>> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.2.0-rc7 (commit >>>>> 5d45a415f3a29898d92380380cfd82bfc7f579ea): >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.2.0-rc7 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.0-rc7-bin/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file: >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1394 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.0-rc7-docs/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.2.0 can be found at the following >>>>> URL: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12349407 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.2.0-rc7. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> FAQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ========================= >>>>> >>>>> How can I help test this release? >>>>> >>>>> ========================= >>>>> >>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking >>>>> >>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then >>>>> >>>>> reporting any regressions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install >>>>> >>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala >>>>> >>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test >>>>> >>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so >>>>> >>>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> =========================================== >>>>> >>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.2.0? >>>>> >>>>> =========================================== >>>>> >>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.2.0 can be found at: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target >>>>> Version/s" = 3.2.0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug >>>>> >>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should >>>>> >>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an >>>>> >>>>> appropriate release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ================== >>>>> >>>>> But my bug isn't fixed? >>>>> >>>>> ================== >>>>> >>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the >>>>> >>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous >>>>> >>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression >>>>> >>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to >>>>> >>>>> help target the issue. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- Xinli Shang
