You would want to shade this dependency in your app, in which case you would be using log4j 2. If you don't shade and just include it, you will also be using log4j 2 as some of the API classes are different. If they overlap with log4j 1, you will probably hit errors anyway.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:33 PM James Yu <ja...@ispot.tv> wrote: > Question: Spark use log4j 1.2.17, if my application jar contains log4j 2.x > and gets submitted to the Spark cluster. Which version of log4j gets > actually used during the Spark session? > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, December 13, 2021 8:25 AM > *To:* Jörn Franke <jornfra...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Pralabh Kumar <pralabhku...@gmail.com>; dev <dev@spark.apache.org>; > user.spark <u...@spark.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE > > This has come up several times over years - search JIRA. The very short > summary is: Spark does not use log4j 1.x, but its dependencies do, and > that's the issue. > Anyone that can successfully complete the surgery at this point is welcome > to, but I failed ~2 years ago. > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:02 AM Jörn Franke <jornfra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it in any case appropriate to use log4j 1.x which is not maintained > anymore and has other security vulnerabilities which won’t be fixed anymore > ? > > Am 13.12.2021 um 06:06 schrieb Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>: > > > Check the CVE - the log4j vulnerability appears to affect log4j 2, not > 1.x. There was mention that it could affect 1.x when used with JNDI or SMS > handlers, but Spark does neither. (unless anyone can think of something I'm > missing, but never heard or seen that come up at all in 7 years in Spark) > > The big issue would be applications that themselves configure log4j 2.x, > but that's not a Spark issue per se. > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:46 PM Pralabh Kumar <pralabhku...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi developers, users > > Spark is built using log4j 1.2.17 . Is there a plan to upgrade based on > recent CVE detected ? > > > Regards > Pralabh kumar > >
