+1

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:42 PM L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:41 PM Chao Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:11 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 08:50, Yuming Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 2:20 AM Matei Zaharia <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1, very excited about this direction.
> >>>>
> >>>> Matei
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 13, 2022, at 11:07 AM, Herman van Hovell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Let me kick off the voting...
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:02 PM Herman van Hovell <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: "Spark Connect"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The goal of the SPIP is to introduce a Dataframe based client/server
> API for Spark
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please also refer to:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Previous discussion in dev mailing list: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Spark
> Connect - A client and server interface for Apache Spark.
> >>>>> - Design doc: Spark Connect - A client and server interface for
> Apache Spark.
> >>>>> - JIRA: SPARK-39375
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> >>>>> [ ] +0
> >>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind Regards,
> >>>>> Herman
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to