Yes, that's the current status.

FYI, 3.3.1-rc3 tag was created 6 days ago but the vote was not started
because we are waiting for

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-40703

Chao Sun pinged the release manager 4 days ago and has been working on it.
Now, his PR is ready for 3.3.1 release here.

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38196/files

BTW, thank you for asking the question, Jonathan.

Dongjoon.


On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:06 PM Jonathan Kelly <jonathaka...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yep, makes sense. Thanks for the quick response!
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:04 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually yeah that is how the release vote works by default at Apache:
>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>
>> However I would imagine there is broad consent to just roll another RC if
>> there's any objection or -1. We could formally re-check the votes, as I
>> think the +1s would agree, but think we've defaulted into accepting a
>> 'veto' if there are otherwise no objections.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:01 PM Jonathan Kelly <jonathaka...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Yuming,
>>>
>>> In your original email, you said that the vote "passes if a majority +1
>>> PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes". There were four +1 votes
>>> (all from PMC members) and one -1 (also from a PMC member), so shouldn't
>>> the vote pass because both requirements (majority +1 and minimum of 3 +1
>>> votes) were met?
>>>
>>> I don't personally mind either way if the vote is considered passed or
>>> failed (and I see you've already cut the v3.3.1-rc3 tag but haven't started
>>> the new vote yet), but I just wanted to ask for clarification on the
>>> requirements.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Jonathan Kelly
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 7:49 PM Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you all for testing and voting!
>>>>
>>>> There's a -1 vote here, so I think this RC fails. I will prepare for
>>>> RC3 soon.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:34 AM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me, with a few comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw the following failures, are these known issues/flakey tests ?
>>>>>
>>>>> * PersistenceEngineSuite.ZooKeeperPersistenceEngine
>>>>> Looks like a port conflict issue from a quick look into logs (conflict
>>>>> with starting admin port at 8080) - is this expected behavior for the 
>>>>> test ?
>>>>> I worked around it by shutting down the process which was using the
>>>>> port - though did not investigate deeply.
>>>>>
>>>>> * org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite was
>>>>> aborted
>>>>> It is expecting these artifacts in $HOME/.m2/repository
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. tomcat#jasper-compiler;5.5.23!jasper-compiler.jar
>>>>> 2. tomcat#jasper-runtime;5.5.23!jasper-runtime.jar
>>>>> 3. commons-el#commons-el;1.0!commons-el.jar
>>>>> 4. org.apache.hive#hive-exec;2.3.7!hive-exec.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> I worked around it by adding them locally explicitly - we should
>>>>> probably  add them as test dependency ?
>>>>> Not sure if this changed in this release though (I had cleaned my
>>>>> local .m2 recently)
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than this, rest looks good to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Mridul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 2:56 PM Sean Owen <sro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me, same result as last RC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:21 AM Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark 
>>>>>>> version 3.3.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time October 3th and passes if a 
>>>>>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.3.1
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.3.1-rc2 (commit 
>>>>>>> 1d3b8f7cb15283a1e37ecada6d751e17f30647ce):
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.3.1-rc2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.1-rc2-bin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1421
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.1-rc2-docs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.3.1 can be found at the following 
>>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12351710
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.3.1-rc2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FAQ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>> How can I help test this release?
>>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>>>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>>>>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>>>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>>>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>>>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>>>>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.3.1?
>>>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.3.1 can be found at:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target 
>>>>>>> Version/s" = 3.3.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>>>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>>>>>> appropriate release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>>>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>>>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>>>>>> help target the issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to