+1

Best regards,
Maciej Szymkiewicz

Web:https://zero323.net
PGP: A30CEF0C31A501EC

On 7/29/23 11:28, Mich Talebzadeh wrote:
+1 for me.

Though Databriks did a good job releasing the code.

GitHub - databricks/spark-xml: XML data source for Spark SQL and DataFrames <https://github.com/databricks/spark-xml>


Mich Talebzadeh,
Solutions Architect/Engineering Lead
Palantir Technologies Limited
London
United Kingdom


**view my Linkedin profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>


https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh

*Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk.Any and all responsibility for any loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may arise from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly disclaimed. The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages arising from such loss, damage or destruction.



On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 06:34, Jia Fan <fanjiaemi...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:


    + 1


    2023年7月29日 13:06,Adrian Pop-Tifrea <poptifreaadr...@gmail.com>
    写道:

    +1, the more data source formats, the better, and if the solution
    is already thoroughly tested, I say we should go for it.

    On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 06:35 Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote:

        +1

        On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 15:54 Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:

            +1 I think that porting the package 'as is' into Spark is
            probably worthwhile.
            That's relatively easy; the code is already pretty
            battle-tested and not that big and even originally came
            from Spark code, so is more or less similar already.

            One thing it never got was DSv2 support, which means XML
            reading would still be somewhat behind other formats. (I
            was not able to implement it.)
            This isn't a necessary goal right now, but would be
            possibly part of the logic of moving it into the Spark
            code base.

            On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 5:38 PM Sandip Agarwala
            <sandip.agarw...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:

                Dear Spark community,

                I would like to start the vote for "SPIP: XML data
                source support".

                XML is a widely used data format. An external
                spark-xml package
                (https://github.com/databricks/spark-xml) is
                available to read and write XML data in spark. Making
                spark-xml built-in will provide a better user
                experience for Spark SQL and structured streaming.
                The proposal is to inline code from the spark-xml
                package.

                SPIP link:
                
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZaOBT4-YFtN58UCx2cdFhlsKbie1ugAn-Fgz_Dddz-Q/edit?usp=sharing

                JIRA:
                https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-44265

                Discussion Thread:
                https://lists.apache.org/thread/q32hxgsp738wom03mgpg9ykj9nr2n1fh

                Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
                [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
                [ ] +0
                [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because __.

                Thanks, Sandip


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to