+1

发件人: Jia Fan <fanjia1...@gmail.com>
日期: 2023年9月12日 星期二 10:08
收件人: Ruifeng Zheng <ruife...@apache.org>
抄送: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org>, Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com>, Mridul 
Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>, Peter Toth <peter.t...@gmail.com>, Spark dev 
list <dev@spark.apache.org>, Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com>
主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.0 (RC5)

+1

Ruifeng Zheng <ruife...@apache.org<mailto:ruife...@apache.org>> 于2023年9月12日周二 
08:46写道:
+1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 7:24 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
<gurwls...@apache.org<mailto:gurwls...@apache.org>> wrote:
+1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 7:05 AM Xiao Li 
<gatorsm...@gmail.com<mailto:gatorsm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1

Xiao

Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com<mailto:xyliyuanj...@gmail.com>> 
于2023年9月11日周一 10:53写道:
@Peter Toth<mailto:peter.t...@gmail.com> I've looked into the details of this 
issue, and it appears that it's neither a regression in version 3.5.0 nor a 
correctness issue. It's a bug related to a new feature. I think we can fix this 
in 3.5.1 and list it as a known issue of the Scala client of Spark Connect in 
3.5.0.
Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com<mailto:mri...@gmail.com>> 于2023年9月10日周日 
04:12写道:

+1

Signatures, digests, etc check out fine.
Checked out tag and build/tested with -Phive -Pyarn -Pmesos -Pkubernetes

Regards,
Mridul

On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 10:02 AM Yuanjian Li 
<xyliyuanj...@gmail.com<mailto:xyliyuanj...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Please vote on releasing the following candidate(RC5) as Apache Spark version 
3.5.0.


The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time Sep 11th and passes if a majority 
+1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.


[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.0

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/


The tag to be voted on is v3.5.0-rc5 (commit 
ce5ddad990373636e94071e7cef2f31021add07b):

https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.5.0-rc5


The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.0-rc5-bin/


Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS


The staging repository for this release can be found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1449


The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.0-rc5-docs/


The list of bug fixes going into 3.5.0 can be found at the following URL:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12352848


This release is using the release script of the tag v3.5.0-rc5.


FAQ


=========================

How can I help test this release?

=========================

If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking

an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then

reporting any regressions.


If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install

the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala

you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test

with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so

you don't end up building with an out of date RC going forward).


===========================================

What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.5.0?

===========================================

The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.5.0 can be found at:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target Version/s" 
= 3.5.0


Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug

fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should

be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an

appropriate release.


==================

But my bug isn't fixed?

==================

In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the

release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous

release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression

that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to

help target the issue.


Thanks,

Yuanjian Li

Reply via email to