A good point agreed.

Mich Talebzadeh,
Technologist | Architect | Data Engineer  | Generative AI | FinCrime
PhD <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy> Imperial College
London <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_College_London>
London, United Kingdom


   view my Linkedin profile
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>


 https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh



*Disclaimer:* The information provided is correct to the best of my
knowledge but of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note
that, as with any advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand
expert opinions (Werner  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>Von
Braun <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>)".


On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 06:14, Martin Grund <mar...@databricks.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Absolutely we should do that. I thought that the default rule was
> inclusive already so that once folks have their first contribution it would
> automatically allow kicking of the workflows.
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 04:20 Matthew Powers <matthewkevinpow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yea, this would be great.
>>
>> spark-connect-go is still experimental and anything we can do to get it
>> production grade would be a great step IMO.  The Go community is excited to
>> write Spark... with Go!
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:49 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The Spark Connect Go client repository (
>>> https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-go) requires GitHub Actions
>>> runs for individual commits within contributors' PRs.
>>>
>>> This policy was intentionally applied (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24387), but we can change
>>> this default once we reach a consensus on it.
>>>
>>> I would like to allow GitHub Actions runs for contributors by default to
>>> make the development faster. For now, I have been approving individual
>>> commits in their PRs, and this becomes overhead.
>>>
>>> If you have any feedback on this, please let me know.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to