+1 Rishab Joshi <[email protected]> 于2025年9月24日周三 10:57写道：
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 7:23 PM Yuming Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 7:03 AM Denny Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Sent via Superhuman <https://sprh.mn/[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 3:33 PM, Kousuke Saruta <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> 2025年9月24日(水) 7:19 Mich Talebzadeh <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> well. I see Nimrod has a valid point here. one can hide “Spark Connect >>>>> vs classic Spark SQL (HiveServer2/Beeline/Thrift) from users by putting a >>>>> thin abstraction in front. >>>>> Once that abstraction layer is there, then the hand over becomes >>>>> transparent. Your app talks to a Spark Connect endpoint, the Spark driver >>>>> runs in the cluster. Works with DataFrame API and SQL. >>>>> In essence you design a small library (or service) that exposes one >>>>> API to users and chooses the backend under the bonnet. >>>>> >>>>> HTH >>>>> >>>>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh, >>>>> Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR >>>>> >>>>> view my Linkedin profile >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 23 Sept 2025 at 21:40, Nimrod Ofek <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> That's the thing - I don't expect the users to know if they are >>>>>> connecting to Spark or Spark connect. >>>>>> That means I would expect the driver to support both Spark Connect - >>>>>> and the current Hive/ Beeline /Thrift server. >>>>>> Maybe even some regular Spark API (even a simple "jar" that just runs >>>>>> the query and returns the results somehow, haven't really thought about >>>>>> it >>>>>> in depth). >>>>>> >>>>>> The point I'm trying to make is that the user that wants to run a SQL >>>>>> command using JDBC - doesn't care if it's Spark or Spark connect or >>>>>> whatever - it's like a Database for the user... >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Nimrod >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 5:24 PM Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Nimrod, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure I get your question. Maybe the name should be 'JDBC >>>>>>> Driver for Spark Connect Server'? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From the user's perspective, they simply use a JDBC driver to connect >>>>>>> to the Connect Server to run SQL >>>>>>> and retrieve the results, without having to worry about whether Spark >>>>>>> is running in classic or Connect mode. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Cheng Pan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:17 PM Nimrod Ofek <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I'll raise an issue with this- I don't think the user that uses >>>>>>> jdbc to Spark should know if he is working with Spark connect or regular >>>>>>> Spark.... >>>>>>> > The jdbc driver should know how to work with connect with fallback >>>>>>> maybe, but the user doesn't care if he is getting Spark connect or >>>>>>> not... >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>>> > Nimrod >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > בתאריך יום ב׳, 22 בספט׳ 2025, 16:04, מאת 杨杰 <[email protected] >>>>>>> >: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Hi Spark devs, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> I would like to start a vote on the SPIP: JDBC Driver for Spark >>>>>>> Connect >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Discussion thread: >>>>>>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rx5pqh01c86slpqv9161hqwgm5lwxxzq >>>>>>> >> SPIP: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ahk4C16o1Jj1TbLg5ylzgHjvu2Ic2zTrcMuvLjqSoAQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.1gf0bimgty0t >>>>>>> >> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-53484 >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>>>> >> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > > -- > Regards > Rishab Joshi >
