The RC should be just the directory where the artifact live but the final name should omit the RCxx
Hmm not sure if IPMCs will be picky about this but should not be blocker to release. - Henry On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]<javascript:;>> wrote: > Hey Roman, > > We can do this in the future - I wasn't sure exactly what the right > standard approach was. Just so I understand, the change you are > proposing from what is there now is just to remove rcX from the > file-names, correct? > > - Patrick > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Patrick Wendell >> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> wrote: >>> FYI this vote ends in 8 hours. >> >> I was going to test it on a fully distributed Bigtop cluster, but hit >> a few snags. That now will extend into the weekend. >> >> Of course, that's not that big of a deal -- I can always vote on >> incubator general once you guys move the vote over there. >> >> The only minor nit for the future I've noticed is that I would >> highly encourage you to follow the usual RC practices where >> you name all of your artifact as final bits and have a subdirectory >> that reflects the RC name. E.g. here's how a very recent >> Hadoop RC looks like: >> http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.1.1-beta-rc0/ >> >> Thanks, >> Roman.
