For most development, you might not need to do assembly. You can run most of 
the unit tests if you just do sbt compile -- only the ones that spawn 
processes, like DistributedSuite, won't work. That said, we are looking to 
optimize assembly by maybe having it only package the dependencies rather than 
Spark itself -- there were some messages on this earlier. For now I'd just 
recommend doing it in a RAMFS if possible (symlink the assembly/target 
directory to be a RAMFS).

Matei

On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:45 AM, Evan Chan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Once you have compiled everything the first time using SBT (assembly will
> do that for you), successive runs of assembly are much faster.  I just did
> it on my MacBook Pro in about 36 seconds.
> 
> Running builds using IntelliJ or an IDE is wasted time, because the
> compiled classes go to a different place than SBT.   Maybe there's some way
> to symlink them.
> 
> -Evan
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Markus Losoi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> Hi Markus,
>> 
>>> have a look at the bottom of this wiki page:
>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark
>> 
>>> IntelliJ IDEA seems to be quite popular (that I am using myself)
>>> although Eclipse should work fine, too. There is another sbt plugin for
>>> generating Eclipse project files.
>> 
>> The IDE seems to work nicely, but what is the fastest way to build Spark?
>> If
>> I make a change to the "core" module and choose "Make Module 'core'" from
>> the "Build" menu in IntelliJ Idea, then the IDE compiles the source code.
>> To
>> create the "spark-assembly-0.8.0-incubating-hadoop1.0.4.jar" JAR file, I
>> have run "sbt assembly" on the command line. However, this takes an
>> impractically long time (843 s when I last ran it on my workstation with an
>> Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 and 8 GB of RAM). Is there any faster way?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Markus Losoi ([email protected])
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Evan Chan
> Staff Engineer
> [email protected]  |
> 
> <http://www.ooyala.com/>
> <http://www.facebook.com/ooyala><http://www.linkedin.com/company/ooyala><http://www.twitter.com/ooyala>

Reply via email to