+1 -- Nan Zhu
On Friday, February 7, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com > (mailto:pwend...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > We should document this on the wiki! > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com > > (mailto:mri...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > This is neat, thanks Reynold ! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mridul > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com > > > (mailto:r...@databricks.com)> wrote: > > > > You can do > > > > > > > > sbt/sbt assemble-deps > > > > > > > > > > > > and then just run > > > > > > > > sbt/sbt package > > > > > > > > each time. > > > > > > > > > > > > You can even do > > > > > > > > sbt/sbt ~package > > > > > > > > for automatic incremental compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com > > > > (mailto:zhunanmcg...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, all > > > > > > > > > > Is it always necessary to run sbt assembly when you want to test some > > > > > code, > > > > > > > > > > Sometimes you just repeatedly change one or two lines for some failed > > > > > test > > > > > case, it is really time-consuming to sbt assembly every time > > > > > > > > > > any faster way? > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Nan Zhu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
