+1 to the proposal On Thursday, February 6, 2014, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a break out from the other thread. I'd like to propose two > guidelines for pull requests. These guidelines are to make things > easier to track for developers and users, and to help organize the > large number of PR's that we are receiving. Thoughts? > > 1. Pull requests will require associated JIRA's. We will ask people to > create a JIRA if there is none yet. > > 2. Pull request names should ideally convey: > (a) The JIRA name > (b) A title summarizing the patch > (c) [optional prefix] The library it is related to > (d) [optional prefix] WIP or RFC if it is not finished. > > Example names: > SPARK-123: Add some feature to Spark > [STREAMING] SPARK-123: Add some feature to Spark streaming > [MLLIB] [WIP] SPARK-123: Some potentially useful feature for MLLib > > - Patrick >
