Hi Kate,
please accept my apology for late response.

I do not have any strong preference to any particular documentation system. I 
would just prefer to have plain text files rather than more complex structures 
(like the mentioned XML).

Jarcec

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:36:44PM -0700, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> Thanks Cheolsoo and Jagat for your feedback.
> 
> Jagat, in regards to your question about what was the issue with how the
> Sqoop1 docs were generated: Sqoop1 docs were generated with a native
> tool, AsciiDoc.
> For Sqoop2, we need a document system that does not require the user to
> install a native tool.
> 
> Other Sqoop Devs - what's your document system preference?
> 
> Regards, Kathleen
> 
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jagat Singh <jagatsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > We should avoid xml files at they consume lot of time managing the
> > documents.
> >
> > How about
> >
> > http://maven.apache.org/doxia/references/apt-format.html
> >
> > Hadoop core has moved away from xml docs to maven apt types docs.
> >
> > Also what were the issues with old sqoop1 docs , those were text based and
> > managing those files was easy thing i guess.
> >
> >
> > On 21-Jun-2012 5:01 AM, "Cheolsoo Park" <cheol...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for RST.
> > >
> > > I don't enjoy editing xml files. But if xdoc provides
> > > better integration with maven, I wouldn't mind using it either.
> > >
> > > Cheolsoo
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Kathleen Ting <kathl...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Sqoop Devs -
> > > >
> > > > In regards to implementing a documentation system for Sqoop2 (
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-492), I am leaning towards
> > > > either RST (http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html) or xdoc (
> > > > maven.apache.org/doxia/references/xdoc-format.html).
> > > >
> > > > Do you have a preference between RST or xdoc?
> > > >
> > > > Or feel free to propose another documentation format for consideration.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kathleen
> > > >
> > >
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to