Thank you for driving the release Richard! I’ve took a look and overall it looks good to me. I’ve noticed that we’ve added bunch of dependencies that are not properly mentioned in the LICENSE.txt file. Pretty much similar to my note at ongoing 1.4.6 [1] release. We have a good track of properly documenting the licenses of libraries that we’re shipping, so I’m wondering if we can quickly fix that?
Also I’ve noticed that the artifacts contains “sqoop.iml” file that probably doesn’t belong there :) (it’s InteliJ project file if I’m not mistaken). Jarcec Links: 1: http://markmail.org/message/xukjt3iw4kqv2ixo > On Apr 7, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Zhou, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for the typo in the email subject. > > > Regards > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.99.1 > > Hi all Sqoop developers, > > This is the first cut of Sqoop 2 branch, version 1.99.6. There are 3 purposes > of this release: > > - Role Based Access Control ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1763 ) > - Making the Rest API backwards compatible ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2162 ) > - Fixing Sqoop2 upgrade path ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1841 ) > > *** Please cast your vote by Friday 2015-4-12 *** > > The list of fixed issues: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=commitdiff;h=2ee73c2810ec99be7c37f2823bd6c2a2ba347f3c > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5, *.sha): > http://people.apache.org/~abe/sqoop/releases/1.99.6/ > > The tag to be voted upon: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.6-rc0 > > The KEYS file: > http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS > > Thanks Abe for the great support to make it happen. > > > Regards > Richard >
