> On March 8, 2016, 3:58 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote: > > docs/src/site/sphinx/security/Encryption.rst, lines 17-19 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44489/diff/1/?file=1287108#file1287108line17> > > > > There will be multiple Encryption points that we will have to > > eventually cover. Would it make sense to rename this section to be clear > > that it's only for the REST interface? > > Abraham Fine wrote: > i think we can do that when we add them
Fine with me. - Jarek ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44489/#review122529 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 8, 2016, 8:44 p.m., Abraham Fine wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44489/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 8, 2016, 8:44 p.m.) > > > Review request for Sqoop. > > > Bugs: SQOOP-2876 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2876 > > > Repository: sqoop-sqoop2 > > > Description > ------- > > SQOOP-2876: Sqoop2: Document TLS support > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/site/sphinx/security/Encryption.rst PRE-CREATION > docs/src/site/sphinx/security/SecurityGuideOnSqoop2.rst > 7194d3bb72f58a952cc9250a372b823412afe0cd > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44489/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > n/a > > > Thanks, > > Abraham Fine > >
