[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16465464#comment-16465464
]
Szabolcs Vasas commented on SQOOP-3322:
---------------------------------------
Hi [~dvoros],
Thank you for raising this Jira it is a really nice catch!
I think we could also bump up the redist dependencies to the versions we use
during testing since this fix will most probably end up in a big major release,
what do you think?
Szabolcs
> Version differences between ivy configurations
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-3322
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3322
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 1.4.7
> Reporter: Daniel Voros
> Assignee: Daniel Voros
> Priority: Minor
>
> We have multiple ivy configurations defined in ivy.xml.
> - The {{redist}} configuration is used to select the artifacts that need to
> be distributed with Sqoop in its tar.gz.
> - The {{common}} configuration is used to set the classpath during
> compilation (also refered to as 'hadoop classpath')
> - The {{test}} configuration is used to set the classpath during junit
> execution. It extends the {{common}} config.
> Some artifacts end up having different versions between these three
> configurations, which means we're using different versions during
> compilation/testing/runtime.
> Differences:
> ||Artifact||redist||common (compilation)||test||
> |commons-pool|not in redist|1.5.4|*1.6*|
> |commons-codec|*1.4*|1.9|1.9|
> |commons-io|*1.4*|2.4|2.4|
> |commons-logging|*1.1.1*|1.2|1.2|
> |slf4j-api|*1.6.1*|1.7.7|1.7.7|
> I'd suggest using the version *in bold* in all three configurations, based on:
> - keep version from redist (where there is one), since that's the version we
> were shipping with and used in production
> - keep the latest version in case of commons-pool that is not part of the
> redist config
> To achieve this we should exclude these artifacts from the transitive
> dependencies and define them explicitly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
