[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16465464#comment-16465464 ]
Szabolcs Vasas commented on SQOOP-3322: --------------------------------------- Hi [~dvoros], Thank you for raising this Jira it is a really nice catch! I think we could also bump up the redist dependencies to the versions we use during testing since this fix will most probably end up in a big major release, what do you think? Szabolcs > Version differences between ivy configurations > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: SQOOP-3322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3322 > Project: Sqoop > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 1.4.7 > Reporter: Daniel Voros > Assignee: Daniel Voros > Priority: Minor > > We have multiple ivy configurations defined in ivy.xml. > - The {{redist}} configuration is used to select the artifacts that need to > be distributed with Sqoop in its tar.gz. > - The {{common}} configuration is used to set the classpath during > compilation (also refered to as 'hadoop classpath') > - The {{test}} configuration is used to set the classpath during junit > execution. It extends the {{common}} config. > Some artifacts end up having different versions between these three > configurations, which means we're using different versions during > compilation/testing/runtime. > Differences: > ||Artifact||redist||common (compilation)||test|| > |commons-pool|not in redist|1.5.4|*1.6*| > |commons-codec|*1.4*|1.9|1.9| > |commons-io|*1.4*|2.4|2.4| > |commons-logging|*1.1.1*|1.2|1.2| > |slf4j-api|*1.6.1*|1.7.7|1.7.7| > I'd suggest using the version *in bold* in all three configurations, based on: > - keep version from redist (where there is one), since that's the version we > were shipping with and used in production > - keep the latest version in case of commons-pool that is not part of the > redist config > To achieve this we should exclude these artifacts from the transitive > dependencies and define them explicitly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)