On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected] >>... Optional security features are fine as long as they don't burden the >> simple use case and don't make the code more complex than it needs to >> be. >> > The "Stateless" Stable launcher which seems to be the one suited for your > needs has no security modules...
That would be fine then, so your proposal would be to enable security by default *for a specific launcher*? That's much easier to +1, but as I just said we also need a description of what you guys are trying to achieve. -Bertrand
