Ok, so switch to maven 3 with the next parent release or what do you
suggest?

Cheers,
Reto

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Mavne 3 has been around quite a while now. Any specific reason not to
> lift
> > the requirement?
> >
>
> * There are no specific features of the new shade version I am using
> * I do not want to make the change while we are in the middle of
> releasing different components.
>
> see also http://stanbol.markmail.org/thread/q7i5l4nsnoi6ig52
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> > [INFO] Error resolving version for
> >> 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin': Plugin requires Maven
> >> version 3.0
> >>
> >> My upgrade to the maven-shade-plugin:2.0 as broken Stanbol build
> >> compatibility for Maven 2. Because of that I downgraded to version
> >> 1.7.1 with revision 1442126 [1].
> >>
> >> best
> >> Rupert
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1442126&view=rev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> | Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>

Reply via email to