On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Fabian Christ
<christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> okay, so I can proceed to make trunk technically releasable. The other task
> is to review all resolved Jira issues and prepare the release docs. This
> will take a couple of days anyway.
>
> Do I understand correctly that you would like to make the ng branch the new
> trunk after the release? Sounds reasonable to me and switching to
> 1.0-SNAPSHOT, too.

Yes I think that would be the easiest was to go. trunk becomes
branches/pre-1 and commons-ng become trunk.

Cheers,
Reto

>
> Best,
> - Fabian
> Am 17.07.2013 15:22 schrieb "Reto Bachmann-Gmür" <r...@wymiwyg.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Right now I'm porting the enhancer to ng. With that we would have the
>> two most heavily developed components in ng and I think we should move
>> the ongoing development to the code in that branch.
>>
>> So I wanted to propose this after finishing the current porting. This
>> would mean to have one last release from the pre-ng code and then
>> switch to the ng-branch and globaly to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT versions.
>>
>> I'd suggest to wait a couple of days till we have the enhancer in ng
>> and maybe Enrico ported one more component as to be able to see if we
>> can coordinate this release with the switch to ng.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Fabian Christ
>> <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > time has passed since our last releases at the beginning of 2013. Since
>> new
>> > features are under development in different branches we should fix what
>> we
>> > have in the trunk.
>> >
>> > I propose to prepare a big release of the trunk with all its major
>> > components. I would exclude the launchers and bundlelists in this
>> release.
>> >
>> > When that is done we should release bundlelists and launcher
>> configurations
>> > based on stable (released) components.
>> >
>> > I will start to check the trunk for RAT compliance. Once everything is
>> > checked I would create a release branch.
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > - Fabian
>>

Reply via email to