Hi Tarandeep, * Stanford Core NLP models are higher quality as the one available for OpenNLP * I had once trained Stanford NER and OpenNLP NER model based on the same trainings data and my impression was that results with Stanford NER where a little bit better * Memory consumption of Stanford NLP is - based on my experience - about 5 time higher as with OpenNLP. * Processing times are similar
For english you can use both Stanford NLP and OpenNLP with Stanbol. OpenNLP is directly integrated for StanfordNLP you need to use [1]. See also [2] for a full list of supported NLP frameworks and languages. hope this helps best Rupert [1] https://github.com/westei/stanbol-stanfordnlp [2] http://stanbol.staging.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/nlp/#integrated-nlp-frameworks On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney <tsawh...@innodata.com> wrote: > A polite reminder. Can anyone share some inputs on this. > > best regards > tarandeep > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sawhney, Tarandeep Singh < > tsawh...@innodata.com> wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> Can you please provide some inputs to understand how does Open NLP >> compares with GATE (Stanford Core NLP). >> >> I have been trying to find some sought of comparison matrix/information to >> find a good answer on this >> >> Any inputs on this please will be very help ful >> >> best regards >> tarandeep >> > > -- > > "This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use > of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, > forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful." -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
