+1 for me!
2014-03-05 10:58 GMT+01:00 Eric Damphousse <edamphou...@gmail.com>: > Of course Git would be a welcomed move > > > On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:55, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 Of Course > > > > El 05/03/14 07:11, Sergio Fernández escribió: > >> Hi Stanbolers, > >> > >> this is not the first time I put this on the table of the community, > but the discussion never went further... But now 0.1.20 release is out, I > think is a good time to refresh it. > >> > >> I'm not sure what others think, but personally I find so inconvenient > that Stanbol still uses svn as scm (in fact it's the only project where I > use it at the momemnt). Switching to a dvcs would bring many possibilities > currently we do not have, specially now that we have to keep the 0.12.x > long-term maintenance branch. > >> > >> Actually the svn is already being mirrored (read-only) to git: > >> > >> git://git.apache.org/stanbol.git > >> http://github.com/apache/stanbol > >> > >> But I can check Infra to make a testing migration to a real repository. > The transition should not take so long. > >> > >> What do you think? Comments are welcomed. > >> > >> Cheers, > > >
