Hi Mark, Sorry for the delayed response. Please, find my comments inline.
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014, mark.lo...@cyrenllc.com < mark.lo...@cyrenllc.com> wrote: > Well, just wanted you all to know that I've had a very successful POC demo > this week and we are going to take a closer look at what Stanbol can do for > the customer. The customer did have a few questions that I'm not > completely sure how to answer and I'm hoping you have some time to > enlighten me. > > 1. Are there any competitors using this type of semantic technology open > source or commercial? I said no, but I couldn't be definitive. If you take a look to the Stanbol list archive, you will find people from several companies using Stanbol. Also I suppose that most of the committers use stanbol in their companies. Also you can take a look to Redlink.co which SaaS platform uses Stanbol as one of the main components. > > 2. What document types does the enhancer work on? I demoed HTML, but > they're interested in PDF, Word, Excel. > > You can use any document parseable by Apache Tika and you need to include Tika in your enhancement chain. > 3. From an Ontology standpoint, can I somehow weight the enhancement > results higher based on a customer Ontology than on the built in > Ontologies? Thus the customer ontology results would be weighted higher in > the Confidence value. If you mean to boost entities from concrete sites, AFAIK it is not possible. > > > Thank you for your support so far. When I get to real development there > will be much more we want to do than what I demoed. The technology worked > very well for what I wanted to show. The next steps will include custom > configuration and possibly some plugin development and may even include a > custom enhancer. Still trying to figure out what the real design will be. > > Thank you, > > Mark Loper > CTO > Cyren LLC > mark.lo...@cyrenllc.com <javascript:;> > 703-951-3116 > > On Mar 17, 2014, at 5:39 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > El 16/03/14 14:31, Mark Loper escribió: > >> To get around this I'm programmatically filtering my results using the > confidence value. Is there a way to configure the enhancement chain to do > this filtering for me? With a Rule possibly? I feel like it can do it, > but I can't figure out how. Any thoughts? > > AFAIK this is not possible yet, but should be more or less > straightforward to create a "post-processing" engine for performing this > kind of filtering. Would you like to give it a try? > > > > Cheers, > > Rafa > >
