Hi,
I've started to implement the dbpedia properties logic and I'd like to get
some feedback on some things that I am doing :
I want to get a NER from the text and search for it in the dbpedia data so
that I can get certain dbpedia properties.
The way I'm trying to do this is by getting the NER_ANNOTATION chunk's text
and search that in the Entityhub ( which from what I saw is by default
configured with dbpedia data). I haven't yet performed a query to actually
get the data but before I continue I'd like to ask if this is the way to go?
Thanks,
Cristian
2014-03-28 15:12 GMT+02:00 Cristian Petroaca <cristian.petro...@gmail.com>:
> Examples :
>
> 1. Group membership :
> a. Spatial membership :
>
> "Microsoft anounced its 2013 earnings. <coref>The Richmond-based
> company</coref> made huge profits."
>
> b. Organisational membership :
>
> "Mick Jagger started a new solo album. <coref>The Rolling Stones
> singer</coref> did not say what the theme will be."
>
> 2. Functional membership :
>
> "Allianz announced its 2013 earnings. <coref>The financial services
> company</coref> made a huge profit."
>
> 3. If no matches were found for the current NER with rules from above
> then if the yago:class which matched has more than 2 nouns then we also
> consider this a good co-reference but with a lower confidence maybe.
>
> "Boris Becker will take part in a demonstrative tennis match.
> <coref>The former tennis player</coref> will play again after 10 years."
>
>
> 2014-03-28 12:22 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Cristian, all
>>
>> Looks good to me, nut I am not sure if I got everything. If you could
>> provide example texts where those rules apply it would make it much
>> easier to understand.
>>
>> Instead of using dbpedia properties you should define your own domain
>> model (ontology). You can than align the dbpedia properties to your
>> model. This will allow it to apply this approach also to knowledge
>> bases other than dbpedia.
>>
>> For people new to this thread: The above message adds to the
>> suggestion first made by Cristian on 4th February. Also the following
>> 4 messages (until 7th Feb) provide additional context.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Cristian Petroaca
>> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > After Rupert's last suggestions related to this enhancement engine I
>> > devised a more comprehensive algorithm for matching the noun phrases
>> > against the NER properties.Please take a look and let me know what you
>> > think. Thanks.
>> >
>> > The following rules will be applied to every noun phrase in order to
>> find
>> > co-references:
>> >
>> > 1. For each NER prior to the current noun phrase in the text match the
>> > yago:class label to the contents of the noun phrase.
>> >
>> > For the NERs which have a yago:class which matches, apply:
>> >
>> > 2. Group membership rules :
>> >
>> > a. spatial membership : the NER is part of a Location. If the noun
>> > phrase contains a LOCATION or a demonym then check any location
>> properties
>> > of the matching NER.
>> >
>> > If matching NER is a :
>> > - person, match against :birthPlace, :region, :nationality
>> > - organisation, match against :foundationPlace, :locationCity,
>> > :location, :hometown
>> > - place, match against :country, :subdivisionName, :location,
>> >
>> > Ex: The Italian President, The Richmond-based company
>> >
>> > b. organisational membership : the NER is part of an Organisation.
>> If
>> > the noun phrase contains an ORGANISATION then check the following
>> > properties of the maching NER:
>> >
>> > If matching NER is :
>> > - person, match against :occupation, :associatedActs
>> > - organisation ?
>> > - location ?
>> >
>> > Ex: The Microsoft executive, The Pink Floyd singer
>> >
>> > 3. Functional description rule: the noun phrase describes what the NER
>> does
>> > conceptually.
>> > If there are no NERs in the noun phrase then match the following
>> properties
>> > of the matching NER to the contents of the noun phrase (aside from the
>> > nouns which are part of the yago:class) :
>> >
>> > If NER is a:
>> > - person ?
>> > - organisation : , match against :service, :industry, :genre
>> > - location ?
>> >
>> > Ex: The software company.
>> >
>> > 4. If no matches were found for the current NER with rules 2 or 3 then
>> if
>> > the yago:class which matched has more than 2 nouns then we also consider
>> > this a good co-reference but with a lower confidence maybe.
>> >
>> > Ex: The former tennis player, the theoretical physicist.
>> >
>> > 5. Based on the number of nouns which matched we create a confidence
>> level.
>> > The number of matched nouns cannot be lower than 2 and we must have a
>> > yago:class match.
>> >
>> > For all NERs which got to this point, select the closest ones in the
>> text
>> > to the noun phrase which matched against the same properties (yago:class
>> > and dbpedia) and mark them as co-references.
>> >
>> > Note: all noun phrases need to be lemmatized before all of this in case
>> > there are any plurals.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-03-25 20:50 GMT+02:00 Cristian Petroaca <
>> cristian.petro...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> That worked. Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> So, there are no exceptions during the startup of the launcher.
>> >> The component tab in the felix console shows 6 WeightedChains the first
>> >> time, including the default one but after my changes and a restart
>> there
>> >> are only 5 - the default one is missing altogether.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-03-24 20:18 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
>> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Cristian,
>> >>>
>> >>> I do see the same problem since last Friday. The solution as mentions
>> >>> by [1] works for me.
>> >>>
>> >>> mvn -Djsse.enableSNIExtension=false {goals}
>> >>>
>> >>> No Idea why https connections to github do currently cause this. I
>> >>> could not find anything related via Google. So I suggest to use the
>> >>> system property for now. If this persists for longer we can adapt the
>> >>> build files accordingly.
>> >>>
>> >>> best
>> >>> Rupert
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7615645/ssl-handshake-alert-unrecognized-name-error-since-upgrade-to-java-1-7-0
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > I did a clean on the whole project and now I wanted to do another
>> "mvn
>> >>> > clean install" but I am getting this :
>> >>> >
>> >>> > "[INFO]
>> >>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> >>> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.6:
>> >>> > run (download) on project org.apache.stanbol.data.opennlp.lang.es:
>> An
>> >>> Ant
>> >>> > BuildE
>> >>> > xception has occured: The following error occurred while executing
>> this
>> >>> > line:
>> >>> > [ERROR]
>> >>> >
>> C:\Data\Projects\Stanbol\main\data\opennlp\lang\es\download_models.xml:3
>> >>> > 3: Failed to copy
>> >>> > https://github.com/utcompling/OpenNLP-Models/raw/58ef0c6003140
>> >>> > 3e66e47ae35edaf58d3478b67af/models/es/opennlp-es-maxent-pos-es.bin
>> to
>> >>> > C:\Data\Pr
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> ojects\Stanbol\main\data\opennlp\lang\es\downloads\resources\org\apache\stanbol\
>> >>> > data\opennlp\es-pos-maxent.bin due to
>> javax.net.ssl.SSLProtocolException
>> >>> > handshake alert : unrecognized_name"
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2014-03-20 11:25 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
>> >>> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> stanbol.enhancer.chain.weighted.chain=["tika;optional","langdetect","opennlp-sentence","opennlp-token","opennlp-pos","opennlp-ner","dbpediaLinking","entityhubExtraction","dbpedia-dereference","pos-chunker"]
>> >>> >> > service.ranking=I"-2147483648"
>> >>> >> > stanbol.enhancer.chain.name="default"
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Does look fine to me. Do you see any exception during the startup
>> of
>> >>> >> the launcher. Can you check the status of this component in the
>> >>> >> component tab of the felix web console [1] (search for
>> >>> >> "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.chain.weighted.impl.WeightedChain").
>> If
>> >>> >> you have multiple you can find the correct one by comparing the
>> >>> >> "Properties" with those in the configuration file.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I guess that the according service is in the 'unsatisfied' as you
>> do
>> >>> >> not see it in the web interface. But if this is the case you should
>> >>> >> also see the according exception in the log. You can also manually
>> >>> >> stop/start the component. In this case the exception should be
>> >>> >> re-thrown and you do not need to search the log for it.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> best
>> >>> >> Rupert
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> [1] http://localhost:8080/system/console/components
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > 2014-03-20 7:39 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
>> >>> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> you can not send attachments to the list. Please copy the
>> contents
>> >>> >> >> directly to the mail
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> thx
>> >>> >> >> Rupert
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> > The config attached.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > 2014-03-19 9:09 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> >> >> > <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> can you provide the contents of the chain after your
>> >>> modifications?
>> >>> >> >> >> Would be interesting to test why the chain is no longer
>> active
>> >>> after
>> >>> >> >> >> the restart.
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> You can find the config file in the 'stanbol/fileinstall'
>> folder.
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> best
>> >>> >> >> >> Rupert
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> > Related to the default chain selection rules : before
>> restart I
>> >>> >> had a
>> >>> >> >> >> > chain
>> >>> >> >> >> > with the name 'default' as in I could access it via
>> >>> >> >> >> > enhancer/chain/default.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Then I just added another engine to the 'default' chain. I
>> >>> assumed
>> >>> >> >> that
>> >>> >> >> >> > after the restart the chain with the 'default' name would
>> be
>> >>> >> >> persisted.
>> >>> >> >> >> > So
>> >>> >> >> >> > the first rule should have been applied after the restart
>> as
>> >>> well.
>> >>> >> But
>> >>> >> >> >> > instead I cannot reach it via enhancer/chain/default
>> anymore
>> >>> so its
>> >>> >> >> >> > gone.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Anyway, this is not a big deal, it's not blocking me in any
>> >>> way, I
>> >>> >> >> just
>> >>> >> >> >> > wanted to understand where the problem is.
>> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> > 2014-03-18 7:15 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> >> >> >> > <rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Cristian
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> >> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > 1. Updated to the latest code and it's gone. Cool
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > 2. I start the stable launcher -> create a new instance
>> of
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > PosChunkerEngine -> add it to the default chain. At this
>> >>> point
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > everything
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > looks good and works ok.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > After I restart the server the default chain is gone and
>> >>> >> instead I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > see
>> >>> >> >> >> >> this
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > in the enhancement chains page : all-active (default,
>> id:
>> >>> 149,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > ranking:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> 0,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > impl: AllActiveEnginesChain ). all-active did not
>> contain
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > 'default'
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > word before the restart.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Please note the default chain selection rules as
>> described at
>> >>> [1].
>> >>> >> >> You
>> >>> >> >> >> >> can also access chains chains under
>> >>> '/enhancer/chain/{chain-name}'
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> best
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Rupert
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> [1]
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://stanbol.staging.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/chains/#default-chain
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > It looks like the config files are exactly what I need.
>> >>> Thanks.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> > 2014-03-17 9:26 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks Rupert.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > A couple more questions/issues :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 1. Whenever I start the stanbol server I'm seeing
>> this
>> >>> in the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > console
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > output :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> This should be fixed with STANBOL-1278 [1] [2]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 2. Whenever I restart the server the Weighted Chains
>> get
>> >>> >> messed
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > up. I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > usually use the 'default' chain and add my engine to
>> it
>> >>> so
>> >>> >> there
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > are
>> >>> >> >> >> >> 11
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > engines in it. After the restart this chain now
>> contains
>> >>> >> around
>> >>> >> >> 23
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> engines
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > in total.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> I was not able to replicate this. What I tried was
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> (1) start up the stable launcher
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> (2) add an additional engine to the default chain
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> (3) restart the launcher
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> The default chain was not changed after (2) and (3).
>> So I
>> >>> would
>> >>> >> >> need
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> further information for knowing why this is happening.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Generally it is better to create you own chain
>> instance as
>> >>> >> >> modifying
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> one that is provided by the default configuration. I
>> would
>> >>> also
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> recommend that you keep your test configuration in text
>> >>> files
>> >>> >> and
>> >>> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> copy those to the 'stanbol/fileinstall' folder. Doing
>> so
>> >>> >> prevent
>> >>> >> >> you
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> from manually entering the configuration after a
>> software
>> >>> >> update.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> The
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> production-mode section [3] provides information on
>> how to
>> >>> do
>> >>> >> >> that.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> best
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Rupert
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1278
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/r1576623
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> [3]
>> http://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/production-mode
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > ERROR: Bundle
>> >>> org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engine.topic.web
>> >>> >> >> [153]:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Error
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > starting
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> slinginstall:c:\Data\Projects\Stanbol\main\launchers\stable\target\stanbol\star
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> tup\35\org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engine.topic.web-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > (org.osgi
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > .framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in
>> >>> bundle
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > org.apache.stanbol.e
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > nhancer.engine.topic.web [153]: Unable to resolve
>> 153.0:
>> >>> >> missing
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > requirement [15
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 3.0] package; (&(package=javax.ws.rs
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> )(version>=0.0.0)(!(version>=2.0.0))))
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved
>> >>> constraint in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > bundle
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > org.apache.s
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > tanbol.enhancer.engine.topic.web [153]: Unable to
>> resolve
>> >>> >> 153.0:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> missing
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > require
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > ment [153.0] package; (&(package=javax.ws.rs
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > )(version>=0.0.0)(!(version>=2.0.0))
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > )
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > at
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundle(Felix.java:3443)
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > at
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1727)
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > at
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:1156)
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > at
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:264
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > )
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Despite of this the server starts fine and I can use
>> the
>> >>> >> >> enhancer
>> >>> >> >> >> >> fine.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Do
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > you guys see this as well?
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 2. Whenever I restart the server the Weighted Chains
>> get
>> >>> >> messed
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > up. I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > usually use the 'default' chain and add my engine to
>> it
>> >>> so
>> >>> >> there
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > are
>> >>> >> >> >> >> 11
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > engines in it. After the restart this chain now
>> contains
>> >>> >> around
>> >>> >> >> 23
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> engines
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > in total.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 2014-03-11 9:47 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> NER Annotations are typically available as both
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> NlpAnnotations.NER_ANNOTATION and
>> fise:TextAnnotation
>> >>> [1]
>> >>> >> in
>> >>> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> enhancement metadata. As you are already accessing
>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> AnayzedText I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> would prefer using the
>> NlpAnnotations.NER_ANNOTATION.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> best
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rupert
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> [1]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/enhancementstructure.html#fisetextannotation
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I assume I should get the Named entities using the
>> >>> same
>> >>> >> but
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NlpAnnotations.NER_ANNOTATION?
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 2014-03-10 13:29 GMT+02:00 Rupert Westenthaler <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hallo Cristian,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NounPhrases are not added to the RDF enhancement
>> >>> results.
>> >>> >> >> You
>> >>> >> >> >> >> need to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> use the AnalyzedText ContentPart [1]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> here is some demo code you can use in the
>> >>> >> computeEnhancement
>> >>> >> >> >> >> method
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> AnalysedText at =
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NlpEngineHelper.getAnalysedText(this,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> ci,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> true);
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Iterator<? extends Section> sections =
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> at.getSentences();
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> if(!sections.hasNext()){ //process as
>> single
>> >>> >> >> sentence
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> sections =
>> >>> >> Collections.singleton(at).iterator();
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> }
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> while(sections.hasNext()){
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Section section = sections.next();
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Iterator<Span> chunks =
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> section.getEnclosed(EnumSet.of(SpanTypeEnum.Chunk));
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> while(chunks.hasNext()){
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Span chunk = chunks.next();
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Value<PhraseTag> phrase =
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> chunk.getAnnotation(NlpAnnotations.PHRASE_ANNOTATION);
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> if(phrase.value().getCategory()
>> ==
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> LexicalCategory.Noun){
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> log.info(" - NounPhrase
>> [{},{}]
>> >>> {}",
>> >>> >> >> new
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Object[]{
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> chunk.getStart(),chunk.getEnd(),chunk.getSpan()});
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> }
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> }
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> }
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hope this helps
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> best
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rupert
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [1]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://stanbol.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/nlp/analyzedtext
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I started to implement the engine and I'm
>> having
>> >>> >> problems
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> getting
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > results for noun phrases. I modified the
>> "default"
>> >>> >> >> weighted
>> >>> >> >> >> >> chain
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> also
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > include the PosChunkerEngine and ran a sample
>> text
>> >>> :
>> >>> >> >> "Angela
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Merkel
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> visted
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > China. The german chancellor met with various
>> >>> people".
>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> expected
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> that
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > RDF XML output would contain some info about
>> the
>> >>> noun
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > phrases
>> >>> >> >> >> >> but I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> cannot
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > see any.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Could you point me to the correct way to
>> generate
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> noun
>> >>> >> >> >> >> phrases?
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Cristian
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 2014-02-09 14:15 GMT+02:00 Cristian Petroaca <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> cristian.petro...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Opened
>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1279
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-02-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Cristian Petroaca <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> cristian.petro...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Rupert,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> The "spatial" dimension is a good idea. I'll
>> also
>> >>> >> take a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> look
>> >>> >> >> >> >> at
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yago.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I will create a Jira with what we talked
>> about
>> >>> here.
>> >>> >> It
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> will
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> probably
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> have just a draft-like description for now
>> and
>> >>> will
>> >>> >> be
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> updated
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> as I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> go
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> along.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Cristian
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 2014-02-06 15:39 GMT+02:00 Rupert
>> Westenthaler <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> definitely an interesting approach. You
>> should
>> >>> have
>> >>> >> a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> look at
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Yago2
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> [1]. As far as I can remember the Yago
>> taxonomy
>> >>> is
>> >>> >> much
>> >>> >> >> >> >> better
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> structured as the one used by dbpedia.
>> Mapping
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> suggestions of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> to concepts in Yago2 is easy as both
>> dbpedia and
>> >>> >> yago2
>> >>> >> >> do
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> provide
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> mappings [2] and [3]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > 2014-02-05 15:39 GMT+02:00 Rafa Haro
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > <rh...@apache.org>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> "Microsoft posted its 2013 earnings. The
>> >>> >> Redmond's
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> company
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> made
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> huge profit".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thats actually a very good example. Spatial
>> >>> contexts
>> >>> >> >> are
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> very
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> important as they tend to be often used for
>> >>> >> >> referencing.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> So I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> would
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> suggest to specially treat the spatial
>> context.
>> >>> For
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> spatial
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Entities
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> (like a City) this is easy, but even for
>> other
>> >>> >> (like a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Person,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Company) you could use relations to spatial
>> >>> entities
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> define
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> their
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> spatial context. This context could than be
>> >>> used to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> correctly
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> link
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> "The Redmond's company" to "Microsoft".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> In addition I would suggest to use the
>> "spatial"
>> >>> >> >> context
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> each
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> entity (basically relation to entities that
>> are
>> >>> >> cities,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> regions,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> countries) as a separate dimension, because
>> >>> those
>> >>> >> are
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> very
>> >>> >> >> >> >> often
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> used
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> for coreferences.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> [1]
>> http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/yago-naga/yago/
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> [2]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.9/links/yago_links.nt.bz2
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> [3]
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/yago-naga/yago/download/yago/yagoDBpediaInstances.ttl.7z
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Cristian
>> >>> Petroaca
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > There are several dbpedia categories for
>> each
>> >>> >> entity,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> this
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> case
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > Microsoft we have :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > category:Companies_in_the_NASDAQ-100_Index
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > category:Microsoft
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> category:Software_companies_of_the_United_States
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> category:Software_companies_based_in_Washington_(state)
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > category:Companies_established_in_1975
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> category:1975_establishments_in_the_United_States
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> category:Companies_based_in_Redmond,_Washington
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> category:Multinational_companies_headquartered_in_the_United_States
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > category:Cloud_computing_providers
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> category:Companies_in_the_Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > So we also have "Companies based in
>> >>> >> >> Redmont,Washington"
>> >>> >> >> >> >> which
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> could
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> be
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > matched.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > There is still other contextual
>> information
>> >>> from
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> which
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> can
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> be
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> used.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > For example for an Organization we could
>> also
>> >>> >> >> include :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > dbpprop:industry = Software
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > dbpprop:service = Online Service Providers
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > and for a Person (that's for Barack
>> Obama) :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > dbpedia-owl:profession:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> dbpedia:Author
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > dbpedia:Constitutional_law
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> dbpedia:Lawyer
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > dbpedia:Community_organizing
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > I'd like to continue investigating this
>> as I
>> >>> think
>> >>> >> >> that
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > it
>> >>> >> >> >> >> may
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> have
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> some
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > value in increasing the number of
>> coreference
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > resolutions
>> >>> >> >> >> >> and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> I'd
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> like
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > concentrate more on precision rather than
>> >>> recall
>> >>> >> >> since
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > we
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> already
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> have
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > set of coreferences detected by the
>> stanford
>> >>> nlp
>> >>> >> tool
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> this
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> would
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> be as
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > an addition to that (at least this is how
>> I
>> >>> would
>> >>> >> >> like
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> use
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> it).
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > Is it ok if I track this by opening a
>> jira? I
>> >>> >> could
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > update
>> >>> >> >> >> >> it
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> show
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> my
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > progress and also my conclusions and if it
>> >>> turns
>> >>> >> out
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > that
>> >>> >> >> >> >> it
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> was
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bad
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> idea
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > then that's the situation at least I'll
>> end up
>> >>> >> with
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > more
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> knowledge
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> about
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > Stanbol in the end :).
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > 2014-02-05 15:39 GMT+02:00 Rafa Haro
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> > <rh...@apache.org>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> The approach sounds nice. I don't want
>> to be
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> devil's
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> advocate
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> but
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> I'm
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> just not sure about the recall using the
>> >>> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> categories
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> feature.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> For
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> example, your sentence could be also
>> >>> "Microsoft
>> >>> >> >> posted
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> its
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2013
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> earnings.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> The Redmond's company made a huge
>> profit".
>> >>> So,
>> >>> >> maybe
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> including
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> more
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> contextual information from dbpedia could
>> >>> >> increase
>> >>> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> recall
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> but
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> course
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> will reduce the precision.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> Cheers,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> Rafa
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> El 04/02/14 09:50, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> escribió:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> Back with a more detailed description
>> of the
>> >>> >> steps
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> for
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> making
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> this
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> kind of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> coreference work.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> I will be using references to the
>> following
>> >>> >> text in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> steps
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> below
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> order to make things clearer :
>> "Microsoft
>> >>> posted
>> >>> >> >> its
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2013
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> earnings.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> The
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> software company made a huge profit."
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 1. For every noun phrase in the text
>> which
>> >>> has :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> a. a determinate pos which implies
>> >>> >> reference
>> >>> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> an
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> entity
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> local
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> text, such as "the, this, these") but
>> not
>> >>> >> "another,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> every",
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> etc
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> which
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> implies a reference to an entity
>> outside of
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> text.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> b. having at least another noun
>> aside
>> >>> from
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> main
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> required
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> noun
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> which
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> further describes it. For example I
>> will not
>> >>> >> count
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> "The
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> company"
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> as
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> being
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> legitimate candidate since this could
>> >>> create a
>> >>> >> lot
>> >>> >> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> false
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> positives by
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> considering the double meaning of some
>> words
>> >>> >> such
>> >>> >> >> as
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> "in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> company
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> good people".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> "The software company" is a good
>> candidate
>> >>> >> since we
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> also
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> have
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> "software".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2. match the nouns in the noun phrase
>> to the
>> >>> >> >> contents
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> categories of each named entity found
>> prior
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> location
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> noun
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> phrase in the text.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> The dbpedia categories are in the
>> following
>> >>> >> format
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (for
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Microsoft
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> example) : "Software companies of the
>> United
>> >>> >> >> States".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> So we try to match "software company"
>> with
>> >>> >> that.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> First, as you can see, the main noun in
>> the
>> >>> >> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> category
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> has a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> plural
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> form and it's the same for all
>> categories
>> >>> which
>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> saw. I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> don't
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> know
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> if
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> there's an easier way to do this but I
>> >>> thought
>> >>> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> applying a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> lemmatizer on
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> the category and the noun phrase in
>> order
>> >>> for
>> >>> >> them
>> >>> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> have a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> common
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> denominator.This also works if the noun
>> >>> phrase
>> >>> >> >> itself
>> >>> >> >> >> >> has a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> plural
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> form.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Second, I'll need to use for comparison
>> >>> only the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> words in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> category
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> which are themselves nouns and not
>> >>> prepositions
>> >>> >> or
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> determiners
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> such
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> as "of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> the".This means that I need to pos tag
>> the
>> >>> >> >> categories
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> contents
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> as
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> well.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> I was thinking of running the pos and
>> lemma
>> >>> on
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> categories when
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> building the dbpedia backed entity hub
>> and
>> >>> >> storing
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> them
>> >>> >> >> >> >> for
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> later
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> use - I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> don't know how feasible this is at the
>> >>> moment.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> After this I can compare each noun in
>> the
>> >>> noun
>> >>> >> >> phrase
>> >>> >> >> >> >> with
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> equivalent
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> nouns in the categories and based on the
>> >>> number
>> >>> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> matches I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> can
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> create a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> confidence level.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 3. match the noun of the noun phrase
>> with
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> rdf:type
>> >>> >> >> >> >> from
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> of the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> named entity. If this matches increase
>> the
>> >>> >> >> confidence
>> >>> >> >> >> >> level.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 4. If there are multiple named entities
>> >>> which
>> >>> >> can
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> match a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> certain
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> noun
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> phrase then link the noun phrase with
>> the
>> >>> >> closest
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> named
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> entity
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> prior
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> to it
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> in the text.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> What do you think?
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Cristian
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2014-01-31 Cristian Petroaca <
>> >>> >> >> >> >> cristian.petro...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Hi Rafa,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> I don't yet have a concrete heursitic
>> but
>> >>> I'm
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> working on
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> it.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'll
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> provide
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> it here so that you guys can give me a
>> >>> >> feedback on
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> it.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> What are "locality" features?
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> I looked at Bart and other coref tools
>> >>> such as
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> ArkRef
>> >>> >> >> >> >> and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> CherryPicker
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> they don't provide such a coreference.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> Cristian
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> 2014-01-30 Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org
>> >:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> Hi Cristian,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Without having more details about your
>> >>> >> concrete
>> >>> >> >> >> >> heuristic,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> in my
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> honest
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> opinion, such approach could produce a
>> >>> lot of
>> >>> >> >> false
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> positives. I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> don't
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> know
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> if you are planning to use some
>> "locality"
>> >>> >> >> features
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> detect
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> such
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> coreferences but you need to take into
>> >>> account
>> >>> >> >> that
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> it
>> >>> >> >> >> >> is
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> quite
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> usual
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> that
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> coreferenced mentions can occurs even
>> in
>> >>> >> >> different
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> paragraphs.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Although
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> I'm
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> not an expert in Natural Language
>> >>> >> Understanding,
>> >>> >> >> I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> would
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> say
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> it
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> quite
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> difficult to get decent
>> precision/recall
>> >>> rates
>> >>> >> >> for
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> coreferencing
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> using
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> fixed rules. Maybe you can give a try
>> to
>> >>> >> others
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> tools
>> >>> >> >> >> >> like
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> BART
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> (
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> http://www.bart-coref.org/).
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Cheers,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Rafa Haro
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> El 30/01/14 10:33, Cristian Petroaca
>> >>> escribió:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> One of the necessary steps for
>> >>> implementing
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Event
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> extraction
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Engine
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> feature :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1121is
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> have
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> coreference resolution in the given
>> text.
>> >>> >> This
>> >>> >> >> is
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> provided
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> now
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> via the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> stanford-nlp project but as far as I
>> saw
>> >>> this
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> module
>> >>> >> >> >> >> is
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> performing
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> mostly
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> pronomial (He, She) or nominal
>> (Barack
>> >>> Obama
>> >>> >> and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Mr.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Obama)
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> coreference
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> resolution.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> In order to get more coreferences
>> from
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> text
>> >>> >> >> I
>> >>> >> >> >> >> though
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> creating
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> some
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> logic that would detect this kind of
>> >>> >> >> coreference :
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> "Apple reaches new profit heights.
>> The
>> >>> >> software
>> >>> >> >> >> >> company
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> just
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> announced
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> its
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> 2013 earnings."
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Here "The software company" obviously
>> >>> refers
>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> "Apple".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> So I'd like to detect coreferences of
>> >>> Named
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Entities
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> which
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> are
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> rdf:type of the Named Entity , in
>> this
>> >>> case
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> "company"
>> >>> >> >> >> >> and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> also
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> have
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> attributes which can be found in the
>> >>> dbpedia
>> >>> >> >> >> >> categories
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> named
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> entity, in this case "software".
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> The detection of coreferences such as
>> >>> "The
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> software
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> company" in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> text
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> would also be done by either using
>> the
>> >>> new
>> >>> >> Pos
>> >>> >> >> Tag
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Based
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Phrase
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> extraction
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Engine (noun phrases) or by using a
>> >>> >> dependency
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> tree of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> sentence and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> picking up only subjects or objects.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> At this point I'd like to know if
>> this
>> >>> kind
>> >>> >> of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> logic
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> would
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> be
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> useful
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> as a
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> separate Enhancement Engine (in case
>> the
>> >>> >> >> precision
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> and
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> good
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> enough) in Stanbol?
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Cristian
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> --
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> | Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> >> >> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> >>> >> >> >> >> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> >>> >> >> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler
>> >>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> >>> >> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler
>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> >>> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
>> ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> >>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> >>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>
>
