I hereby cancel the vote as I prepare a new release candidate. Cheers, Reto
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Reto Gmür <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de> > wrote: > >> Rupert Westenthaler: >> > While I am clearly in favor of this release I would like to have a >> > discussion about the the use version. >> >> Agreed. >> >> > I am strongly against 0.99. IMO only 0.13 or 1.0.0 are possible option. >> >> Agreed. >> >> > Personally I do have a strong >> > preference for 1.0.0 >> >> I do have a preference for 0.13 because AFAIU "only" two modules are >> different fixing "only" two issues. >> > > The "problem" is that then we are likely to have the 1.0.0 launcher using > the 0.13 version of these bundles. Unless we make a new release without > any change except for the version number. > >> >> In general I dislike using version numbers for marketing purposes. But I >> do think that a 1.0.0 version is widely considered a significant step. >> It should not be spent for rather small progress (which definitely is >> important). A 1.0.0 release lets people expect a bit more. >> > I think it is quite clear that this is not a full release. For the opennlp > bundles we already released version 1.1.0 without creating wrong > expectations. > > Cheers, > Reto > > >> >> Cheers, >> Andreas >> > >
