Hi, On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Umutcan Şimşek <umutcan.sim...@mni.thm.de> wrote: > Hi Rupert, > > In previous emails, you mentioned that having everything in one instance > (triple store, enhancer and solr indexer) was a bad idea according to
In a single JVM to be more explicit. Running everything on a single host (or maybe even a single Application Container such as Tomcat) might still be ok. The point is that you use the RESTful service to decouple Stanbol with the triplestore and the search index. > experiences of LMF people. Is there any publication about this situation > where the reasons are explained somehow. I would like to citate in my > thesis. ASAIK we have not published any paper mentioning this. best Rupert > > Best Regards > > Umutcan > > > On 04/28/2015 12:58 PM, Umutcan Şimşek wrote: >> >> Hi Rupert, >> >> I've decided to go on with only enhancer and entityhub; to use fuseki >> server for storage and reasoning. >> >> Now my problem is indexing. >> >> I have three main ontologies, two of them are for extracting semantics >> from custom CMS components, one of them is just extracting the implicit >> semantics in content hierarchy (articles, categories vs) so I'll be able to >> implement semantic search. I did a little research and I encountered [1]. It >> says, Solr components are independent from Stanbol, but when I look at the >> bundles on Osgi console, the solr components are in >> org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr package, not in org.apache.commons.solr >> package. >> >> Lastly, is there a way to integrate Solr server in stanbol with Fuseki >> server? >> >> Best >> >> On 23.04.2015 15:27, Rupert Westenthaler wrote: >>> >>> Hi Umutcan, >>> >>> The Linked Media Framework [1] tried to build a think like you >>> described. In this case it was running a Sesame based triple store, >>> Solr for Semantic Search and Stanbol for enhancing contents all in a >>> single instance. Was we learned form that was that it makes much more >>> sense to keep those things separated. >>> >>> If you want everything in Stanbol I can try to give you some pointers: >>> >>> Im not the most knowledgeable person on the Ontonet, Reasoning and >>> Rules component. But AFAIK it uses Clerezza as storage component. So >>> you can use any triple store that is supported by Clerezza. The most >>> commonly used one is Jena TDB. >>> >>> Stanbol also has a very simple SPARQL endpoint typically published >>> under "/sparql" (http://localhost:8080/sparql) via this you can access >>> graphs managed by Clerezza. So if you have your RDF data stored as >>> Clerezza Graphs you should be able to query them using this endpoint. >>> >>> So if the Ontonet and Reasoning components can use Clerezza to store >>> results it should be possible to also use the Stanbol server as Sparql >>> instance. I hope some of the Ontonet people see this and answer this >>> question >>> >>> Make sure to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT because 0.12.* still use an older >>> Clerezza version that does not yet support Clerezza Fastlane [2] >>> >>> best >>> Rupert >>> >>> [1] https://bitbucket.org/srfgkmt/lmf/ >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-468 >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Umutcan Şimşek >>> <umutcan.sim...@mni.thm.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to implement semantic search for a CMS written in PHP that we >>>> use >>>> in my university as a part of my master's thesis. >>>> >>>> Ontonet seems to be a good solution for storing and reasoning on >>>> instance >>>> and conceptual data. However, as far as I understand from previous >>>> questions, ontonet does not provide a sparql endpoint. >>>> >>>> This leaves me at a point where I need to decide if I should use Stanbol >>>> only for semantic lifting and use another triple store provides sparql >>>> endpoint. Another approach in my mind, retrieving ontologies from >>>> ontonet >>>> temporarily to a reasoner and storing them back with inferred triples, >>>> but I >>>> wonder if there is a simpler way that involves only Stanbol components. >>>> >>>> Is there a formal way to integrate external triple stores to Stanbol? >>>> Could >>>> you suggest some other solution without an external triple store? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> >>>> Umutcan Simsek, MSc Candidate >>>> Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Giessen, Germany >>>> Ege University, Izmir, Turkey >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen | REDLINK.CO .......................................................................... | http://redlink.co/
