Hi Fabian, I guess I could call myself a stanboler. In our case we use Stanbol in production mode as a critical part of content-enhancement engine. The main use-case is to get extractions of concepts we provide via our ontology, which is handled by stanbol.
Thank you, all. — Yauhen > On 16 Jan 2017, at 11:33, Fabian Christ <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi Stanbolers, > > the project managed to release the 1.0.0 release in November 2016. I > would like to get some feedback about what you think should happen > with Apache Stanbol in the future. > > At the moment I have no oversight about who is using Stanbol or for > whom Stanbol is an essential software component in a larger solution. > If there are those people, I would like to invite them to write down > their view on Stanbol and what should happen. > > Maybe the time for Stanbol is over after 5 years of being a top level > Apache project. The ASF has the concept of moving projects to the > attic once there is not enough interest or community for a project > anymore. Another way would be that people start their own GitHub > branch without the overhead of an Apache top level project. Just > thoughts here! > > Best > Fabian > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt
