I assume that Phil Steitz sent this message to dev@ after failing to get any 
response by sending to private@.

Do we still have _any_ active PMC members to actually get a report in?

Do we have _three_ active PMC members left? If not, it's time to start an 
orderly progression towards the Attic. We don't want to just dump a codebase on 
them (much as I'm sure it happens).

Moving to the Attic would be a shame, because there are really good ideas in 
Stanbol, ideas that could have a future. Some of the components might be able 
to find other homes for a new life, but not without active PMC/committer work. 
I certainly don't pretend to understand the complex module architecture well 
enough to excise individual components or rearchitect towards a simpler 
modularization.

ajs6f ; Jena PMC


> On Nov 16, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Phil Steitz <pste...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Stanbol community,
> 
> In the governance model at the ASF the board delegates responsibility for
> managing projects to PMCs. To enable the board to provide oversight across the
> foundation, PMCs are tasked with providing the board with a quarterly
> report on the health of the project. The board has noticed that the reports
> for Stanbol have been missed for a number of months.
> 
> The reports to the board are normally written by the PMC chair but all PMC
> members have an individual responsibility to ensure that a report is
> submitted. If the PMC chair is not available then any PMC member can submit
> the report. If you need help with this process, please reach out to
> bo...@apache.org
> 
> Please ensure that a report for Stanbol is submitted to the board for the
> next meeting.
> 
> If the PMC chair is not going to be available for an extended period of time
> it may make sense to rotate the PMC chair. Rotating the PMC chair does not
> mean the current chair has failed. People's situations and interests change,
> and rotation is good as it allows more people to become familiar with that
> role. Again, if assistance is required with this process, please feel free to
> reach out to bo...@apache.org
> 
> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity reduces
> to a level that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache, projects
> reach this stage when there are no longer 3 active PMC members providing
> oversight. Projects that reach this stage are placed in the attic[1].  If
> Stanbol has reached this point, please reach out to the Attic project to
> arrange transfer. On the other hand, if your project is mostly dormant but
> still has at least three active PMC members it can stay in that state for as
> long as needed. If your project is in such a state, please mention that in
> your report and verify the PMC's state at regular intervals.
> 
> Finally, if you have any questions please feel free to reach out to
> bo...@apache.org.
> 
> Thanks,
> The ASF Board
> 
> [1] (http://attic.apache.org/

Reply via email to