Hi Rafa, Great news, but I cannot modify the final proposal since I had submitted a PDF format, and I cannot edit after the deadline. However, I can edit the proposal in Google Doc, and detail the new tasks that will be implemented. What do you think?
Regards, ~Kamila. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Kamila, > > I could made an effort an tried to co-mentor the project, but prior to > that you would have to modify and extend your proposal covering the new > discussed tasks. That could take you some time, I'm not sure even if you > are allowed to modify the proposal at this point > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:01 PM Kamila Molina Orellana < > kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks Rafa, that sounds cool. That is the reason I wanted to leave open >> the possibility to work on a different activity. Will you be up to mentor >> this task with Andreas? According to the timeline [1], organizations are >> reviewing and selecting proposals. >> >> >> ~Regards, >> Kamila. >> >> [1] https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/#timeline >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Kamila, >>> >>> I'm probably late to the discussion because you have already made a nice >>> progress on the proposal but I just wanted to put another topic on the >>> table which in my opinion could be quite suitable for a GSoC project. It >>> has to do with a new EntityHub Yard implementation. ATM there are (as far >>> as I know) three different Yard implementations based on Solr, Clerezza >>> and >>> Sesame. First one is suitable to be used for Entity Linking and the >>> others >>> could be eventually used as classic TripleStore enabling for example >>> SPARQL >>> querying. We are still missing of a Yard implementation that could fulfil >>> both uses cases with a single technology, basically a Triple Store with >>> full text search capabilities. There are at least a couple of them >>> available like Jena TDB + Jena Text (formerly Jena LARQ) or Stardog which >>> is a commercial triple store providing a Community version as well. >>> >>> I have been interested in this topic for years but never had the proper >>> time to work on it. Apart from the Yard implementation, a new Entity >>> Searcher would be to need implemented as well. @Rupert is a better >>> authorised voice for this anyone as main developer of that part. >>> >>> My 2 cents, >>> >>> Rafa >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:55 AM Kamila Molina Orellana < >>> kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Rupert, >>> > >>> > Thanks for your answer. >>> > >>> > I was seeing STANBOL-320 mostly as data cleaning/management issue. I >>> will >>> > try to describe the scope and possible solutions. >>> > >>> > However, until we define that, I think it is better to leave my >>> proposal >>> > with an open issue. Just to reiterate, I can say that I will exchange >>> the >>> > current SPARQL editor + an issue TBD (the deadline for the proposals >>> is in >>> > 12 hours). So, we can decide an issue or some work in the remaining >>> time. I >>> > said that because you can help me to estimate times, so I don't take an >>> > issue that is too small or too big. >>> > >>> > Finally, this is my proposal [1] in case you have some comments. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > ~Kamila. >>> > >>> > [1] >>> > >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WmropX2Bu_ >>> 0g10VX3ZRE8Jil5kGb8N9RwhSCTs4KFww/edit?usp=sharing >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Rupert Westenthaler < >>> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > Disambiguation is interesting for sure, but also a very broad topic. >>> > > So please make sure to describe scope and possible solutions (e.g. >>> > > approach + frameworks) to the problem. >>> > > >>> > > A dummy example based on STANBOL-320 this could be >>> > > >>> > > * approach: process extracted named entities; filter all with more as >>> > > 5 words and 50 chars >>> > > * frameworks: none >>> > > >>> > > A more realistic example could be >>> > > >>> > > * approach: summary of the approach + links to some papers this >>> > > approach is based on or related to >>> > > * frameworks: links to the frameworks used to implement the approach. >>> > > If required also links to the datasets needed for learning ... >>> > > >>> > > hope this helps >>> > > best >>> > > Rupert >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana >>> > > <kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > I am working into my proposal. I think it would be a good a idea to >>> > > define >>> > > > some ground work that I can work after moving to Squebi. I was >>> looking >>> > at >>> > > > some of the issues, and there are some really interesting However, >>> I am >>> > > > afraid mostly for the time. Specifically, since I have been doing >>> and >>> > > > learning about semantic web and linked data at my school, I was >>> > > interested >>> > > > in the issue of entity disambiguation [1]; it looks really >>> exciting and >>> > > > challenging. Beyond, that I can learn more about Stanbol, I can >>> apply >>> > > some >>> > > > interesting concepts. >>> > > > >>> > > > Or maybe this one about filtering some results of NED engine [2]. >>> Do >>> > you >>> > > > have any other suggestions? Do think It would be to better to fix >>> some >>> > > > others issues that are more critical for the project? >>> > > > >>> > > > Finally, I found this mentoring guide from Apache for GSoC in case >>> > > Antonio >>> > > > or Rafa would like to help Andreas to co-mentoring in GSoC. >>> > > > >>> > > > Hope to hear back from you soon. >>> > > > >>> > > > Regards, >>> > > > ~Kamila. >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1183 >>> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-320 >>> > > > [3] https://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html >>> > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana < >>> > > > kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> Hi, >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Great Antonio , thanks!! :D Then, I would keep working in my >>> proposal >>> > > and >>> > > >> share with you for some feedback. Also, can we define some issues >>> > that I >>> > > >> can work on? Or what could be the extra work? Until then, I will >>> look >>> > at >>> > > >> some issues/code to get some idea of the work. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Regards, >>> > > >> ~Kamila. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:11 AM, Antonio David Pérez Morales < >>> > > >> adperezmora...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> Hi Andreas, >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> I don't have a plenty of time this year, but I think I can find >>> a bit >>> > > of >>> > > >>> time and act as a mentor for this GSoC year. >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> Regards >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> 2018-03-10 4:53 GMT+01:00 Kamila Molina Orellana < >>> > > >>> kamila.molin...@gmail.com> >>> > > >>> : >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> > Hi all, >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Rafa the idea would be use Squebi as the default Sparql >>> Endpoint >>> > > >>> instead of >>> > > >>> > the one being used now [1]. However, Rupert point out that task >>> > > would be >>> > > >>> > really short. So, I say we can add some issues too. Or what do >>> you >>> > > >>> suggest? >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1327 >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Regards, >>> > > >>> > ~Kamila. >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Hi Andreas, >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Can you or the student elaborate here a little bit the idea >>> for >>> > the >>> > > >>> > > project? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:26 AM Andreas Kuckartz < >>> > > a.kucka...@ping.de> >>> > > >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > Hi Kamila and Rupert, >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Sorry for my very belated reply. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was that >>> it >>> > > could >>> > > >>> be >>> > > >>> > > > resolved in a GSOC-project. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Yes, it alone would not be enough for such a project and >>> > > therefore >>> > > >>> > > > significantly more work would need to be included. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > The main problem seems to be to have two mentors. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Is there any of the other Stanbol developers who can and >>> likes >>> > to >>> > > >>> fill >>> > > >>> > > > such a role? It would really help to support Stanbol. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Only then should we attempt to develop the scope of the >>> GSOC >>> > > >>> project. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Cheers, >>> > > >>> > > > Andreas >>> > > >>> > > > --- >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Kamila Molina Orellana schrieb: >>> > > >>> > > > > Thanks Rupert for you answer. I understand it. I was >>> really >>> > > >>> > interested >>> > > >>> > > in >>> > > >>> > > > > Stanbol, so I guess I will keep looking at some other >>> project >>> > > for >>> > > >>> > GSoC. >>> > > >>> > > > > However, If anyone is interested in mentoring, I am still >>> > > looking >>> > > >>> > > forward >>> > > >>> > > > > to contribute. >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > Regards, >>> > > >>> > > > > ~Kamila. >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Rupert Westenthaler < >>> > > >>> > > > > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > >> Hi Kamila >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> Stanbol has very little ongoing development - mostly >>> fixing >>> > > bugs. >>> > > >>> > > > >> While their are for sure topics of interests - >>> especially >>> > > >>> related to >>> > > >>> > > > >> information extraction and classification - I do not >>> know if >>> > > we >>> > > >>> > would >>> > > >>> > > > >> be able to find 2 Developers plan to be active enough >>> for >>> > > >>> Mentoring. >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> For me the GSoC 2018 timeline is troublesome as I will >>> be >>> > > mostly >>> > > >>> > > > >> offline in final evaluation period (6 - 21 August). So I >>> > would >>> > > >>> have >>> > > >>> > a >>> > > >>> > > > >> hard time providing list minute feedback and would have >>> a >>> > hard >>> > > >>> time >>> > > >>> > to >>> > > >>> > > > >> do the final evaluation. >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> best >>> > > >>> > > > >> Rupert >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana >>> > > >>> > > > >> <kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > >>> Hi Rupert. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks so much Rupert for your answer. Do you think the >>> > > project >>> > > >>> > will >>> > > >>> > > go >>> > > >>> > > > >> for >>> > > >>> > > > >>> GSoC? I have been looking at Squebi, and if it is too >>> > short, >>> > > we >>> > > >>> can >>> > > >>> > > try >>> > > >>> > > > >> to >>> > > >>> > > > >>> fix some other issue. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, >>> > > >>> > > > >>> ~Kamila. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Rupert Westenthaler < >>> > > >>> > > > >>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi Kamila, >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> Sorry for the late response, but I wanted wait for >>> Andreas >>> > > to >>> > > >>> > answer >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> this as I do not really agree with him tagging >>> > STANBOL-1327 >>> > > >>> with >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> GSoC2018. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> IMHO this would be not a good topic as it is much to >>> > simple >>> > > and >>> > > >>> > > small >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> (I would expect a maximum of 2 working days to >>> complete >>> > this >>> > > >>> > > feature). >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> Maybe Andreas can add some comments about his >>> intentions >>> > > when >>> > > >>> > > marking >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> this issue with GSoC2018. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> best >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> Rupert >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Feb 2 >>> >> > <https://maps.google.com/?q=%3E+%3E%3E%3E%3E+On+Mon,+Feb+2&; >>> entry=gmail&source=g>6, >> >> >>> > 2018 at 4:58 AM, Kamila Molina Orellana >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> <kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Hi, >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> I have been working in my proposal and wanted to >>> make the >>> > > >>> most of >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> bounding >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> period by interacting with th >>> >> > <https://maps.google.com/?q=interacting+with+th&entry=gmail&source=g>e >> >> >>> > community and the tool. I >>> > > have >>> > > >>> > been >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> working >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> in the proposal and would like to share it with my >>> > > prospective >>> > > >>> > > > mentor. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Anyone from Apache who would like to mentorship? >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Regards, >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> ~Kamila. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Kamila Molina >>> Orellana < >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> Hi all, >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> I am interested in participating in GSOC 2018 and >>> been >>> > > >>> looking >>> > > >>> > at >>> > > >>> > > > the >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> issue and playing a bit with Stanbol. I am a student >>> > from >>> > > the >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> University of >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> Cuenca. I have been working with Semantic >>> technologies >>> > and >>> > > >>> > > currently >>> > > >>> > > > >> in >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> my >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> third year of college. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> Well just a quick overview of what I understand, >>> please >>> > > >>> correct >>> > > >>> > me >>> > > >>> > > > >> if I >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> am >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> wrong. The idea will be to exchange the actual >>> Sparql >>> > > >>> Endpoint >>> > > >>> > for >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> Squebi. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> Then when you go to /sparql, you'll have Squebi >>> > > >>> functionalities, >>> > > >>> > > > >> right? >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> I see you use Fremaker to build the website, OSGI to >>> > load >>> > > >>> > modules. >>> > > >>> > > > >> The >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> actual Sparql Endpoint is loading in >>> bundle/list.xml ( >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.sparql), but when >>> is this >>> > > >>> file >>> > > >>> > > > >> loaded? >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> Where is the module that manages the Sparql >>> Services? I >>> > > mean, >>> > > >>> > the >>> > > >>> > > WS >>> > > >>> > > > >> to >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> make updates and select queries. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> Regards, >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> ~Kamila. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> -- >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> | Rupert Westenthaler >>> > > >>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Bodenlehenstra%C3%9Fe+11&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > > >>> > > ++43-699-11108907 <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> > > >>> > > > <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> | REDLINK.CO .............................. >>> > > >>> > > > >> .............................. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> .............. >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> | http://redlink.co/ >>> > > >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > >> -- >>> > > >>> > > > >> | Rupert Westenthaler >>> > > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> > > >>> > > > >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Bodenlehenstra%C3%9Fe+11&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > > >>> > ++43-699-11108907 <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> > > >>> > > > <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> > > >>> > > > >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> > > >>> > > > >> | REDLINK.CO >>> > > >>> > > > .............................. >>> .............................. >>> > > >>> > > > >> .............. >>> > > >>> > > > >> | http://redlink.co/ >>> > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> > > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Bodenlehenstra%C3%9Fe+11&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> ++43-699-11108907 <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> > <+43%20699%2011108907> >>> > > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> > > | REDLINK.CO >>> > ............................................................ >>> > > .............. >>> > > | http://redlink.co/ >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
