FWIW: Not a PMC member, but I'm willing to declare that my goal is to attain that status. I haven't contributed anything TO Stanbol yet, but I use it heavily within the scope of another OSS project I'm working on and I do intend to get involved with helping the core Stanbol project.
Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote: > Dear Apache Stanbol PMC (and community), > > The board report for Stanbol has not yet been submitted for this month's > board meeting on Wednesday. If you or another member of the PMC are > unable to get it in by twenty-four hours before meeting time, please let > the board know, and plan to report next month. > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting#how > > I see that elsewhere on dev@ people are discussing the activity level in > the project (and a couple of people are still interested, yay!). From > the ASF board's point of view, what is most important is ensuring that > there are at least three PMC members who are active enough that they > could respond to security or other serious issues. > > That is, a mostly-dormant project is fine (because features are done, or > because people don't currently have time to build new ones), but the > board still needs to know there are PMC members watching over the > project, and providing quarterly reports. > > Any PMC member can submit a report for the project if the Chair is not > available this week. The board would also appreciate seeing if there > are three PMC members who could reply to this email, so we know the PMC > still has sufficient attention here to provide oversight. > > Thanks, > -- > > - Shane > Director & Member > The Apache Software Foundation > (on behalf of the ASF Board) >
