Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> I suspect the SEGV discussed in the thread below is due to the patch
> for STDCXX-216: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=616673
>
> Reverting the patch makes the error go away. Travis, can you look
> into it when you have a moment please?
>
> Thanks
> Martin
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/regression-in-set%3A%3Ainsert%28%29-%28was%3A-Re%3A-__rw%3A%3A__string_ref%3A%3Asize-sigsegv%29-tp16182909p16189722.html
Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
