Eric Lemings (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12584333#action_12584333 ]
Eric Lemings commented on STDCXX-708:
-------------------------------------
Wasn't expecting Jira to automatically append that email to the comments in the
issue.
I didn't know you could do that either. All you need to do is send your
response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nifty!
Martin
The cross-post on the dev list shows the proper formatting.
I changed the directive using the suggested directive from _config.h and
testing it now on both HP-UX platforms.
[HP aCC 6.15/HP-UX/IPF] 18.numeric.special.float fails assertions
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: STDCXX-708
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-708
Project: C++ Standard Library
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: trunk
Environment: {noformat}
$ uname -srm && aCC -V
HP-UX B.11.31 ia64
aCC: HP C/aC++ B3910B A.06.15 [May 16 2007]
{noformat}
Reporter: Martin Sebor
Assignee: Eric Lemings
Fix For: 4.2.1
Original Estimate: 4h
Time Spent: 6h
Remaining Estimate: 0h
When compiled with HP aCC 6 on HP-UX running on IPF hardware the newly added
test
[18.numeric.special.float.cpp|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/trunk/tests/support/18.numeric.special.float.cpp]
fails a bunch of assertions.
One of them look like a configuration problem in the library (has_denorm) while
others (min(), max(), and epsilon()) like problems in the test
{noformat}
$ nice gmake 18.numeric.special.float -r && ./18.numeric.special.float
aCC -c -D_RWSTDDEBUG -mt -I/amd/devco/sebor/stdcxx/include \
-I/build/sebor/stdcxx-aCC-6.15-15D/include
-I/amd/devco/sebor/stdcxx/tests/include \
-AA -g +d +DD64 +w +W392 +W655 +W684 +W818 +W819 +W849 +W2193 +W2236 +W2261 \
+W2340 +W2401 +W2487 +W4227 +W4229 +W4231 +W4235 +W4237 +W4249 +W4255 +W4272 \
+W4284 +W4285 +W4286
/amd/devco/sebor/stdcxx/tests/support/18.numeric.special.float.cpp
"/amd/devco/sebor/stdcxx/include/limits", line 449: warning #4070-D: floating
point underflow exception
_RWSTD_STATIC_FUN (long double, (min), _RWSTD_LDBL_MIN)
^
aCC 18.numeric.special.float.o -o 18.numeric.special.float \
-L/build/sebor/stdcxx-aCC-6.15-15D/rwtest -lrwtest15D -AA +nostl -Wl,+s -mt
+DD64 \
-L/build/sebor/stdcxx-aCC-6.15-15D/lib \
-Wl,+b/build/sebor/stdcxx-aCC-6.15-15D/lib:/build/sebor/stdcxx-aCC-6.15-15D/rwtest
\
-lstd15D -lm
rm 18.numeric.special.float.o
# INFO (S1) (10 lines):
# TEXT:
# COMPILER: HP aCC, __HP_aCC = 61500, __EDG_VERSION__ = 308
# ENVIRONMENT: ia64 running hp-ux
# FILE: 18.numeric.special.float.cpp
# COMPILED: Jan 24 2008, 17:28:57
# COMMENT: floating specializations
############################################################
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
# TEXT: numeric_limits<float>::has_denorm == -1, got 1
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# LINE: 1366
# ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
# TEXT: numeric_limits<double>::has_denorm == -1, got 1
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# LINE: 1366
# ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
# TEXT: numeric_limits<long double>::min() == 3.3621e-4932, got 3.3621e-4932
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# LINE: 1253
# ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
# TEXT: numeric_limits<long double>::max() == 1.18973e+4932, got 1.18973e+4932
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# LINE: 1254
# ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
# TEXT: numeric_limits<long double>::epsilon() == 1.92593e-34, got 1.0842e-19
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# LINE: 1262
# ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
# TEXT: numeric_limits<long double>::has_denorm == -1, got 1
# CLAUSE: numeric.special
# LINE: 1366
# +-----------------------+----------+----------+----------+
# | DIAGNOSTIC | ACTIVE | TOTAL | INACTIVE |
# +-----------------------+----------+----------+----------+
# | (S1) INFO | 1 | 1 | 0% |
# | (S5) WARNING | 0 | 3 | 100% |
# | (S7) ASSERTION | 6 | 134 | 95% |
# +-----------------------+----------+----------+----------+
{noformat}
