Farid Zaripov wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Farid Zaripov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d
msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1
LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1
limits DIFF 0
random_shuffle 0 DIFF
21.string.io.stdcxx-250 ABRT NOUT
21.string.stdcxx-231 ABRT NOUT
22.locale.ctype.is 331 0
22.locale.ctype.narrow 0 381 5 0
22.locale.num.put 96 24
22.locale.num.put.stdcxx-2 ABRT NOUT
27.basic.ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-766 ABRT NOUT
27.ostream.unformatted.stdcxx-626 ABRT NOUT
27.ostream 2 0 2 0
27.streambuf.imbue.stdcxx-307 ABRT NOUT
27.stringbuf.overflow.stdcxx-795 ABRT NOUT
The results in 15d configuration and on icc 10.0 in 12d
and 15d are
the same.
Farid.
I'm curious what it means when nothing is shown in a cell.
i.e. what were the results of the limits test for the last
two configurations?
Actually I have compared the src/lib pairs 4.2.0/4.2.0 vs 4.2.0/4.2.1
only
and then 4.2.1/4.2.1 vs 4.2.1/4.2.0 only. So empty cells means that the
results has not changed due to replacing the library file.
But how can there be empty cells in the first and last columns
where the library wasn't replaced?
As for the limits example results, I missed that the results has
changed.
Here the results for limits:
msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1
LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1
limits DIFF 0 DIFF 0
And this is a good thing! It means that 4.2.1 fixes whatever
was causing the DIFF in 4.2.0 :)
Martin
