> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Lemings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:32 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > regular expressions > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:22 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > > regular expressions > > > > Eric Lemings wrote: > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Eric Lemings > > >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:58 PM > > >> To: '[email protected]' > > >> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > > >> regular expressions > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:30 PM > > >>> To: [email protected] > > >>> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > > >>> regular expressions > > >>> > > >>> Martin Sebor wrote: > > >>>> Could we move issues instead of deleting them? > > >>> Also, we're still discussing what the plan is WRT how these > > >>> components will be organized so these kinds of changes seem > > >>> premature. In fact, I'm not sure I see why any issues need > > >>> to be deleted or moved. Why can't the existing ones can be > > >>> changed? > > >> They are subtasks and subtasks can't be moved. I tried. > > > > > > Also, subtasks can't be broken down into smaller issues. Some of > > > these issues will likely need to be subdivided into smaller chunks > > > of work. > > > > As a courtesy to the rest of us working on the project it would > > be nice to let us know what restructuring changes you'd like to > > make, and wait for feedback before making them. Especially > > deleting issues should be brought up because doing so not only > > permanently removes them from the database but also breaks any > > links pointing to such issues. > > Jira is pretty smart. It allows you to relink such issues before > deleting issues so there are no broken links. > > And the issues are still in the database. I just moved them from > subtasks into individual issues. Or you'd prefer to keep the > duplicate issues?
Of course, if there were any data at all attached to these subtasks I would have left them and made a clone as Travis did but AFAICT there is nothing at all really in these issues which is why I deleted them. Brad.
