Eric Lemings wrote: > > >Travis Vitek wrote: >> >> >> This all gets back to the discussion we were having a few weeks ago >> about which compiler features we should expect the compiler >> support for >> 4.3.x. > >I'm adding a Wiki page listing these compiler requirements but I can >only think of one or two ATM. What else should be on this list? >
Well, I'd like to think that we could eliminate all of these. Without some of them them it becomes much more difficult or impossible to implement some of meta classes. _RWSTD_NO_CLASS_PARTIAL_SPEC _RWSTD_NO_BOOL I can live with keeping the following, but a modern compiler should really support these _RWSTD_NO_TYPENAME _RWSTD_NO_EXPLICIT _RWSTD_NO_EXPLICIT_ARG _RWSTD_NO_FRIEND_TEMPLATE _RWSTD_NO_FUNC_PARTIAL_SPEC _RWSTD_NO_NEW_FUNC_TEMPLATE_SYNTAX _RWSTD_NO_NEW_CLASS_TEMPLATE_SYNTAX _RWSTD_NO_INLINE_MEMBER_TEMPLATES /* not used att all */ _RWSTD_NO_NAMESPACE _RWSTD_NO_LONG_DOUBLE _RWSTD_NO_LONG_LONG _RWSTD_NO_WCHAR_T _RWSTD_NO_NATIVE_WCHAR_T >Brad. >
