Travis Vitek wrote:
Eric Lemings wrote:
How's this for a suitable configuration check for static_assert?
// compile-only test
static_assert (sizeof (char) == 1, "impossible");
template <int I> struct S {
static_assert (I >= 0, "template parameter I must be
non-negative");
};
I've written an errily similar test already (pasted below)
I think you should probably instantiate S somewhere and it might be a
good idea put a line break before 'struct' so that your code conforms to
our 'coding standards'.
[...]
It's probably overkill, but just as an FYI, to verify this works
both ways the test would need to be negative, i.e., named NO_XXX,
and write #define _RWSTD_NO_XXX to stdout if the negative assert
failed to fire.
Martin
template <int _N>
struct S
{
static_assert (0 < _N, "fail");
};
template <int _N>
void f ()
{
static_assert (0 < _N, "fail");
}
int main ()
{
S<1> s1;
f<1>();
static_assert (1, "pass");
return 0;
}
