Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
While looking at the hoops we jump through to implement aligned_storage
I recalled the gcc __attribute__ (aligned (N)). Is there any to use it
to simplify the implementation for gcc?
We already do.
You're a step (or a few) ahead of me, as usual... :)
Have a look at the definition of the macro
_RWSTD_TT_ALIGNED_POD().
You mean the one in rw/_gcc-config.h on the 103 character long line?
(You almost got away with it ;-)
I might be able to eliminate __rw_aligned_storage_impl<> if I wanted to
do a partial specialization of __rw_aligned_storage<> on the _Align
non-type template parameter and I could also eliminate
__rw_default_alignment<>, but that is about as much as I think I could
reduce it.
I'm probably missing something but is aligned_storage only specified
for alignment of powers of 2? (It looks to me as though those are the
only alignments we support.)
Martin
See http://tinyurl.com/5kmvdy for reference.
Martin
