Eric Lemings wrote:
I think there should be an implicit #define directive in <rw/_defs.h>:
#if defined _RWSTD_NO_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES
//|| defined _RWSTD_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES if actually
required for C++0x extensions
# define _RWSTD_NO_EXT_CXX_0X
#endif
What does everyone think?
I think it's unnecessary and possibly undesirable. There might be
C++ 0x components that compile without variadic templates, either
because they don't need them (e.g., Random Number Generators) or
because we've provided workarounds (e.g., Type Traits).
Martin
Brad.
-----Original Message-----
From: Travis Vitek
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 2:00 PM
To: Eric Lemings
Subject: RE: svn commit: r673865 - in
/stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities: 20.forward.cpp
20.tuple.cnstr.cpp 20.tuple.creation.cpp 20.tuple.elem.cpp
20.tuple.helpers.cpp 20.tuple.rel.cpp
Yes, I'm porting to aCC and none of the tuple tests compile
(lack of rvalue reference). Actually, now that I think about
it I should probably have added a check for variadic templates. Ugh.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Lemings
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:02 AM
To: Travis Vitek
Subject: RE: svn commit: r673865 - in
/stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities: 20.forward.cpp
20.tuple.cnstr.cpp 20.tuple.creation.cpp 20.tuple.elem.cpp
20.tuple.helpers.cpp 20.tuple.rel.cpp
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: svn commit: r673865 - in
/stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities: 20.forward.cpp
20.tuple.cnstr.cpp 20.tuple.creation.cpp 20.tuple.elem.cpp
20.tuple.helpers.cpp 20.tuple.rel.cpp
Author: vitek
Date: Thu Jul 3 16:26:24 2008
New Revision: 673865
...
Modified: stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utili
ties/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp?rev=673865&r1=673864&r2=673865&view=diff
==============================================================
================
--- stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp
(original)
+++ stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp
Thu Jul 3 16:26:24 2008
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
#include <rw_driver.h>
// compile out all test code if extensions disabled
-#ifndef _RWSTD_NO_EXT_CXX_0X
+#if !defined (_RWSTD_NO_EXT_CXX_0X) \
+ && !defined(_RWSTD_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES)
Just to verify, your reasoning for this is that C++0x
extensions can be enabled but without support for rvalue references?
If so, sounds reasonable. Just wanted to double check.
Brad.
