Travis Vitek wrote: > >Are you sure you don't want to be using _RWSTD_DECLARE_NOTHROW >here, and _RWSTD_DEFINE_NOTHROW with the definition. I only see >_RWSTD_ATTRIBUTE_NOTHROW being defined for gcc, and that means >compile error for all other configurations. > >What is the rationale for using the attribute instead of a >throw spec? I realize that _RWSTD_ATTRIBUTE_NOTHROW will end >up being an empty throw spec on most platforms, but I don't
Whoops, I meant to say _RWSTD_DECLARE_NOTHROW here...
