Re: svn commit: r693424 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp

[Martin Sebor]

faridz wrote:

Author: faridz
Date: Tue Sep  9 03:35:59 2008
New Revision: 693424

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
Log:
2008-09-09  Farid Zaripov  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        * tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
        error on MSVC and ICC/Windows.

Modified:
    stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp

Modified: stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp?rev=693424&r1=693423&r2=693424&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
(original)

+++ stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp Tue Sep 9 03:35:59 2008

@@ -138,14 +138,14 @@
     assert (SCHAR_MAX  == +127);
     assert (SHRT_MAX   >= +32767);

-#ifndef _RWSTD_EDG_ECCP

+#if !defined (_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP) && !defined (_MSC_VER)

_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP should only be #defined when we're using the EDG eccp
vanilla demo, but not when we're using a compiler that sits on top of
the EDG front end such as Intel C++. If this condition evaluates to
true we have a configuration problem...

Martin

// avoid exercising with the EDG eccp front end (strict mode)

     assert (LONG_BIT   >= 32);
     assert (SSIZE_MAX  >= _POSIX_SSIZE_MAX);
     assert (WORD_BIT   >= 32);

-#endif // EDG eccp

+#endif   // EDG eccp || MSVC || ICC/Windows

assert (UCHAR_MAX >= 255);

     assert (UINT_MAX   >= 4294967295);