> Is there some reason that you didn't just fix the regression shown in > STDCXX-1009?
Firstly, I found the regression some time later that I commited changes in xfail.txt. Secondly, I want fix the regression and at the same time leave STDCXX-968 fixed :) Can you, please, verify that replacing 1 with 1L don't issues any warnings on 32-bit and 64-bit aCC? Farid.
