Farid Zaripov wrote:
Why do we need this and the other tests?
I've got the MSVC 10.0 beta recently and I prepairing the stdcxx
for this compiler.
I'm pretty sure you know this but just for completeness:
[...]
If there is a compiler that we need _RWSTD_NO_DOMAIN_ERROR_DTOR for,
won't we also need a macro for every single one of the rest of C++
Standard Library polymorphic classes such as std::ios_base?
Actually, the MSVC 10.0 beta libc contains dtor's for std::length_error
and std::logic_error only (at least in 15s configuration which I've tested).
It is still beta for now, but I believe that these dtors will go to the
release.
Or should I fill the bug report to Microsoft on that issue?
That would be great, thanks! With dtors for arbitrary C++ Standard
Library in their libc there's no way to build/use a third party
implementation such as stdcxx. Imagine one of the dtors doing
something to the class, e.g.:
class length_error: runtime_error { // MSVC 10 definition
char* data;
public:
virtual ~length_error () { delete[] data; }
// ...
}
Martin
Best Regards,
Farid Zaripov
