On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote:
> Ahh, I see now. You are indeed right, that patch is defective. I was under > the impression that we were discussing the (later) attachment > stdcxx-1056-timings.tgz which contains a perfectly forwarding implementation > of the facet public grouping method. The timings I attached there were the > ones I thought we were discussing all along. > > Now, to clear the confusion I created: the timing numbers I posted in the > attachment stdcxx-1056-timings.tgz to STDCXX-1066 (09/11/2012) showed that a > perfectly forwarding, no caching public interface (exemplified by a changed > grouping) performs better than the current implementation. It was that test > case that I hoped you could time, perhaps on SPARC, in both MT and ST > builds. The t.cpp program is for MT, s.cpp for ST. > > Please let me know if this clarifies things. I apologize for the > misunderstanding. It's ok, no need to apologize. I had no idea you had attached a new patch, because I don't get any emails when it gets updated. I could have sworn I was watching it so I don't know why I'm not getting the emails. I didn't get an email about stdcxx-1066 either, not even when I initially opened it, and that is also strange. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
