I asked around and we don't have one available at this time.

Travis

Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 9/25/12 7:56 PM, Stefan Teleman (JIRA) wrote:
>
>       [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>  ]

Anybody around here, except Stefan, who has access to a SPARC V8 machine updated
to the specified kernel update or later, and who is willing to run a simple test
program? It's a 5 minute job at most.

Thanks!

>
> Stefan Teleman closed STDCXX-1066.
> ----------------------------------
>
>      Resolution: Won't Fix
>
> Bug will not be fixed upstream. It is fixed in the Solaris releases.
>
>> SPARCV8 requires pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t to be aligned on an 
>> 8-byte boundary
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                  Key: STDCXX-1066
>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066
>>              Project: C++ Standard Library
>>           Issue Type: Bug
>>           Components: Thread Safety
>>     Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.x, 4.3.x
>>          Environment: Solaris 10 Update 6 or later on SPARCV8 [32-bit]
>> Defect is compiler-independent - in reality it only affects Sun Studio and 
>> GCC.
>>             Reporter: Stefan Teleman
>>               Labels: features, runtime, threads
>>              Fix For: 4.2.2, 4.2.x, 4.3.x
>>
>>          Attachments: _config-gcc.h.stdcxx-1066.patch, 
>> _config-sunpro.h.stdcxx-1066.patch, ctype.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, 
>> exception.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, ios.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, 
>> iostream.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, iostream.stdcxx-1066.patch, 
>> locale_body.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, locale_classic.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, 
>> messages.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, _mutex.h.stdcxx-1066.patch, 
>> time_put.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, use_facet.h.stdcxx-1066.patch
>>
>>
>> Starting with Solaris 10 Update 6, on SPARCV8, pthread_mutex_t and 
>> pthread_cond_t MUST be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. Misaligned access will 
>> result in either SEGV or SIGBUS.
>> There are numerous places in the multi-threaded version of stdcxx where 
>> pthread_mutex_t and/or pthread_cond_t types are contained within an union, 
>> but with an enforced alignment different than 8. All these instances must be 
>> corrected, and #ifdef-guarded for SPARCV8.
>> Patches to follow shortly, this is just opening the issue.
>> Warning: the patchset resolving this issue is very large, and it affects a 
>> large number of files.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>

Reply via email to