On 10/21/12 19:08, Martin Sebor wrote:
There's no requirement that embedded NULs must be preserved (that's just how it happens to be implemented). I find it best to avoid relying on the knowledge of implementation details when exercising the library so that tests don't start failing after a conforming optimization or some such tweak is added to the code.
That's right. I'll improve it. Thanks for the review. Liviu
