On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: > To me, it's not a question of "should we try", but more "do we want to?".
I'd like to see it deployed, and agree that it is a good use of the test ballots. - Sam Ruby > I can push the changes to the repo and it should just work (maybe with a few > more nudges), and would only show up if you add the "?interactive=true" to > the URL, so nothing will change WRT the old system. > > If we don't, then it's probably another year before we can get a lot of > people to try it out at once and see what feedback we get. > What we could do is try it for the test ballots, get feedback and then > decide based on that. After all, it's an option for people, no one will be > forced to use the interactive page, they can pick between the old one or the > new one as they see fit. > > I realize we're quite close to the election (which is what made me start > working on it in the first place ;)), but the math inside the new page is > sound and it's easy for people to double-check that the resulting STV string > matches their choice and order, so even with all my bias, I'd say we should > at least give people the option of trying it out for the test ballots. If > they don't like it, we can wait till next year for the real election. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > > On 2015-03-16 12:29, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Here is my question: >> >> Should we try to impl the drag/drop feature for this >> round of elections, or not? Ideally, if we do, we should >> have it ready to use for the test ballot, which I was planning >> on doing Wednesday, but that may be pushing it. >> >> The key is that whatever we use for the test ballot >> we must use, unaltered, for the real election. >> >>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:23 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Oh no! ;) >>> >>> But really, thanks a ton :) I am itching to get started with the base >>> perl stuff and even more so with the rest api stuff chris has been working >>> on. >>> >>> With regards, >>> Daniel. >>> >>> On 2015-03-16 12:19, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> >>>> Daniel, >>>> >>>> You have been voted committer access to STeVe! > >
